
Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

Implications
In 2026, the trade landscape for Zambia has been reshaped by the "America First" trade policies of the Trump administration. While a universal 10% reciprocal tariff (rising to higher levels for some) was implemented in 2025, Zambia has managed to secure specific protections for its most critical export: refined copper.
Latest US Tariffs Update (2026)
The US trade policy toward Zambia is currently defined by a "transactional" approach, balancing new general tariffs with strategic exemptions for critical minerals.
Universal Reciprocal Tariff: A 10% baseline tariff applies to most Zambian exports. Some sectors (like agriculture) face a 15% general rate as part of the reciprocal trade measures enacted in late 2025.
Copper Exemption: Refined copper, which accounts for roughly 90% of Zambia’s exports to the US, remains largely exempt from the heaviest tariffs. This is due to the US's strategic need for copper in its own manufacturing and energy sectors.
AGOA Status: After significant uncertainty in late 2025, a short-term extension of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) has been implemented through 2028, though it now co-exists with "reciprocal" duties on non-exempt goods.
Lobito Corridor: The US continues to invest in the Lobito Atlantic Railway, which connects Zambia’s copper belt to the Atlantic coast, signaling that the US prioritizes supply chain security over pure tariff revenue in the mining sector.
Major Companies Impacted
The impact of the new tariff regime is split between the "protected" mining giants and the "exposed" agricultural and textile firms.
Company / Sector | Impact Level | Key Details |
First Quantum Minerals | Low | Major copper producer; benefits from the "refined copper" exemption and continued US investment in the Lobito Corridor. |
Barrick Gold (Lumwana) | Low | Proceeding with a $2 billion expansion; the US remains a key destination for copper, and demand outweighs tariff pressures. |
KoBold Metals | Low | US-backed AI exploration firm; exempt from most trade friction due to its role in "critical minerals" supply chains. |
Zambian Honey/Agro-Exporters | High | Faced with a 15% price disadvantage; exports like honey, sugar, and organic produce are struggling to compete with Latin American suppliers. |
Textile Manufacturers | High | Previously reliant on duty-free AGOA access; the new 10-15% duties have made Zambian garments less competitive than Asian alternatives. |
GDP Impact
The overall impact on Zambia's GDP for 2026 is mixed but resilient.
Mining Resilience: Because copper (the GDP engine) is largely shielded, the direct "tariff shock" to the national budget has been minimized.
Growth Projections: Real GDP growth for 2026 is forecasted at approximately 6.2%. This is a slight downward revision from previous estimates of 7.4%, largely due to power supply issues and the "chilling effect" of global trade uncertainty.
Inflationary Pressure: The cost of US-manufactured imports (machinery and tech) has risen, contributing to moderate imported inflation.
Diversification Setback: The 15% tariffs on agriculture have slowed Zambia's efforts to diversify its economy away from copper, as smallholder farmers lose their edge in the US market.
SWOT Analysis: Zambia-US Trade (2026)
STRENGTHS | WEAKNESSES |
* Critical Mineral Wealth: Zambia holds massive reserves of copper and cobalt essential for US tech. | * Copper Dependence: 90% of US-bound exports are a single commodity. |
* Political Alignment: The Hichilema administration maintains a strong pro-West "rapprochement" policy. | * Energy Instability: Ongoing power shortages hamper manufacturing and processing capacity. |
OPPORTUNITIES | THREATS |
* Lobito Corridor: US/EU financing of rail infrastructure reduces logistics costs for exports. | * China Rivalry: Increasing pressure to choose between US investment and Chinese debt/trade. |
* Critical Mineral Agreements: Potential for a "bespoke" trade deal that bypasses general tariffs. | * AGOA Expiry: The looming 2028 deadline for the current AGOA extension creates long-term uncertainty. |
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |