top of page

Vietnam

US Revised Tariffs (%)

10

Ease of doing business

theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:

Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.

 

Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

david-whipple-mU-wz7JlJMc-unsplash_Ravid.jpg
Share of US Imports % (1 implies <1%)
US Tariff %
Revised Tariff %
Country Tariff Rate %
4.2
46
10
1.1
Exports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Imports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Balance (in USD Bill.) 2024
13.1
136.56
-123.46

Implications

The United States and Vietnam have reached a new trade agreement, announced on July 2, 2025. This deal significantly alters the tariff landscape for goods traded between the two nations, aiming to address U.S. concerns about trade imbalances and transshipment.


Key Elements of the New US-Vietnam Trade Deal:


  • Tariffs on Vietnamese Exports to the US: A 20% tariff will now apply to a broad range of Vietnamese exports to the United States. This is a reduction from the originally proposed "reciprocal" tariff of 46% but still a substantial increase from the typically low duties Vietnam enjoyed previously (averaging 2-10%).

  • Transshipment Tariffs: A higher 40% tariff will be imposed on goods deemed to be "transshipped" through Vietnam, particularly those with significant Chinese content and minimal local value-add. This provision is specifically designed to prevent companies from rerouting Chinese goods through Vietnam to avoid U.S. tariffs on Chinese products. The enforcement criteria for this remain somewhat vague, creating a "compliance grey zone" for businesses.

  • Zero Tariffs on US Imports to Vietnam: In a significant concession, Vietnam has agreed to grant zero tariffs on U.S. imports. This means American goods, from agricultural products like soybeans and meat to automobiles and machinery, will enter Vietnam duty-free. This aims to create new market access for U.S. exporters.


Status of Deals and Agreements:


The agreement with Vietnam is one of the few trade deals the U.S. has finalized under the current administration's new tariff push. It follows agreements with the United Kingdom and a framework agreement with China. The broader tariff pause, which had temporarily kept higher tariffs at bay, has been extended until August 1, 2025. After this date, absent further extensions or new deals, the higher tariff rates will automatically take effect for countries that haven't reached agreements.


Implications for Companies:


  • Vietnamese Exporters: Companies exporting from Vietnam to the U.S. will face significantly higher costs due to the 20% tariff. This particularly impacts price-sensitive sectors such as textiles, footwear, furniture, seafood, and electronics. Many companies that shifted production from China to Vietnam to avoid tariffs will find their competitive advantage narrowed. They will need to reassess their supply chains, potentially absorb higher costs, raise prices, or explore new strategies.

  • Transshipment Risk: Businesses with supply chains involving goods that originate in other countries (especially China) and are minimally processed in Vietnam before being sent to the U.S. face a substantial risk of the 40% transshipment tariff. Companies are urged to review their bills of materials and enhance compliance protocols to ensure their goods genuinely meet origin requirements.

  • US Exporters: U.S. companies will benefit from duty-free access to the Vietnamese market, creating new opportunities for American agricultural products, manufacturers, and specialty parts suppliers. This could lead to increased market share for U.S. goods in Vietnam.

  • Vietnamese Domestic Industries: Local Vietnamese industries will face stiffer competition from competitively priced U.S. imports due to the zero-tariff entry for American goods.

  • Supply Chain Diversification and Localization: The deal encourages both Vietnamese and foreign investors to accelerate investment in upstream industries within Vietnam (components, materials) to ensure products meet stricter origin standards and avoid transshipment penalties. Companies may also explore "dual-base" models, with design and strategic management in one country and assembly/tariff-friendly exports in Vietnam.


Overall, while the 20% tariff is lower than initially proposed, it represents a significant shift for businesses engaged in U.S.-Vietnam trade. The emphasis on preventing transshipment indicates a strong intent to ensure that goods genuinely originate from Vietnam to receive the agreed-upon tariff rates. The legal foundation of these tariffs, imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, is also currently under review by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which adds a layer of uncertainty regarding their long-term enforceability.

US Revised Tariffs

Country Tariffs

Balance of Trade

Commercial Guide

Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals

Tariff Rate for US

World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.

US Imports Guide 

United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.

Investing in USA

theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters

Sources : ForbesUSDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia International Trade Administration

theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

theboardiQ Logo

Economic
Relevance
Ranking

Get Great Talent. Subscribe.

Thanks for subscribing!

265 Garnet Dr 

Livermore, CA 94550

  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
bottom of page