
Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

Implications
As of January 2026, Trinidad and Tobago (T&T) continues to navigate the "America First" trade landscape initiated in 2025. While the twin-island republic initially received a "favorable" baseline rate compared to global peers, recent adjustments have increased the fiscal pressure on non-energy exports.
Latest US Tariffs Update (January 2026)
The most significant development is the Reciprocal Tariff regime.
Current Rate: T&T currently faces a 15% reciprocal tariff on many exports to the US. This was increased from the initial 10% baseline in August 2025.
Key Exemptions: Crucially, T&T’s energy sector remains largely protected. Crude petroleum, natural gas, and critical minerals are exempt under "Annex II" of the US executive actions.
Trade Status: Roughly 47% of T&T’s export value to the US is currently unaffected due to these energy exemptions. However, the remaining 53% (manufacturing, chemicals, and metals) faces the full 15% levy.
Major Companies Impacted
The impact is concentrated among industrial giants and manufacturers that utilize the Port of Point Lisas.
Nutrien: As a major fertilizer producer (ammonia and urea), the company faces high tariff exposure. Nutrien has already flagged operational challenges and "controlled shutdowns" due to high costs and trade uncertainty.
NiQuan Energy: Impacted by shifting global demand and higher costs for non-exempt downstream products.
Proman: Affected by the 15% levy on chemical exports, which are a major component of T&T's trade with the US.
Caribbean Airlines: While not directly "tariffed" on goods, it is impacted by the increased costs of US-sourced parts and the broader regional slowdown in trade-related travel.
SME Manufacturers: Local food and beverage exporters (e.g., Angostura) face a 15% price disadvantage in the US market, threatening their competitive edge against Latin American rivals.
GDP and Economic Impact
The Caricom Private Sector Organization (CPSO) and local analysts have projected significant headwinds for 2026:
Revenue Loss: T&T is projected to lose approximately US$291.9 million (nearly TT$2 billion) in annual export revenue due to the 15% tariff.
GDP Growth: 2026 real GDP growth is forecasted to be modest at ~1.5% to 2.0%, tempered by the "tariff shock" in the non-energy sector.
Inflation: Costs of US-origin imports (refined petroleum, machinery, and food) have risen, contributing to domestic headline inflation.
Latest Country Balance of Trade (BOT) - YTD 2026
Note: Estimates based on January 2026 reporting.
Total Bilateral Trade: ~US$6.0 Billion (Annualized).
Current Status: T&T maintains a narrow trade surplus with the US, largely driven by exempt energy exports.
Recent Trend: There is a visible contraction in the surplus. While crude exports remain steady, the value of chemical and metal exports has dipped by roughly 8–10% YTD as US buyers look for cheaper domestic or regional alternatives.
SWOT Analysis: T&T Trade 2026
Strengths | Weaknesses |
Energy Resilience: Crude and LNG exemptions protect nearly half of total export value. | High Concentration: Over-reliance on energy makes the trade balance vulnerable to global price swings. |
Strategic Location: Proximity to the US reduces shipping times compared to Asian competitors. | Operational Inefficiencies: High port costs and foreign exchange scarcity hamper manufacturers. |
Opportunities | Threats |
Nearshoring: US companies looking to move supply chains out of China may look to T&T's industrial zones. | Tariff Escalation: Risk of the reciprocal rate climbing from 15% to 25% by mid-2026. |
Regional Integration: Strengthening CARICOM trade to offset US market losses. | Guyana Competition: Guyana’s rapid oil growth may shift US diplomatic and trade focus away from T&T. |
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |