top of page

Tanzania

US Revised Tariffs (%)

10

Ease of doing business

theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:

Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.

 

Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

david-whipple-mU-wz7JlJMc-unsplash_Ravid.jpg
Share of US Imports % (1 implies <1%)
US Tariff %
Revised Tariff %
Country Tariff Rate %
1
10
10
8.6
Exports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Imports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Balance (in USD Bill.) 2024
0.57
0.2
0.37

US Revised Tariffs

Country Tariffs

Balance of Trade

Commercial Guide

Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals

Tariff Rate for US

World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.

US Imports Guide 

United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.

Implications

As of Sunday, April 20, 2025, here's an update on Tanzania's tariffs and trade policy: Tariff Rates: Tanzania, as a member of the East African Community (EAC), applies the EAC Common External Tariff (CET) on goods imported from outside the EAC. The CET has a four-band structure:   0%: Raw materials, capital goods, agricultural inputs, pure-bred animals, and medicines.   10%: Semi-finished goods. 25%: Finished consumer goods.   35%: Specified products (these are often considered sensitive goods). It's important to note that: Preferential Rates: Goods originating from EAC member states (Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, and South Sudan) are generally subject to zero tariffs.   African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA): Goods imported from other state parties of the AfCFTA may enjoy preferential tariff rates.   Sensitive Goods: Some sensitive goods may attract higher tariff rates, potentially exceeding the maximum rate of 35%.   Other Levies: In addition to import duties, imports are also typically subject to: Value Added Tax (VAT): The standard rate is 18% in Mainland Tanzania and 15% in Tanzania Zanzibar. Excise Duty: Levied on certain consumer goods (both locally manufactured and imported) at varying specific or ad valorem rates (e.g., on beverages, tobacco, petroleum products, and vehicles).   Railway Development Levy (RDL): Generally 1.5% of the CIF value of imports. Customs Processing Fee (CPF): Around 0.6% of the FOB value. Recent Trade Policy Developments: Tanzania officially launched its revised National Trade Policy in June 2024. This new policy aims to transform the country into a competitive, export-led economy, replacing the 2003 policy. Key objectives include:   Improving policy coherence and institutional coordination. Enhancing domestic trade development. Strengthening trade integration and utilizing foreign market opportunities, including the AfCFTA.   Developing economic resilience against global trade shocks. Improving marketing infrastructure and trade facilitation. Strengthening e-commerce infrastructure. Improving access to trade finance. Strengthening private sector engagement in trade development. The policy emphasizes a shift towards an industrial-led socio-economic transformation, focusing on value addition to exports and increasing the competitiveness of Tanzanian products and services in the global market.   Key Takeaway for Businesses: Understanding the specific HS code for your product is crucial to determine the applicable tariff rate under the EAC CET. Consideration should be given to the origin of goods to potentially benefit from preferential tariff rates within the EAC or under the AfCFTA. Factor in other taxes and levies (VAT, excise duty, RDL, CPF) when calculating the total cost of imports. Keep abreast of Tanzania's evolving trade policy, particularly the implementation of the new National Trade Policy 2023, which aims to streamline trade processes and enhance competitiveness.   For the most up-to-date and specific tariff information, it is recommended to consult the Tanzania Revenue Authority (TRA) or a customs broker in Tanzania.

US Negotiation Strategy

Based on the most recent data from 2024, the top imports to the US from Tanzania by value are: Articles of apparel, knit or crocheted ($63.09 Million) U.S. Manufacturing States: California, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama. U.S. Companies (Examples): Hanesbrands (North Carolina), Fruit of the Loom (Kentucky, Georgia), Gildan Activewear (various locations). These companies often have complex supply chains and may not produce all types of knit apparel domestically. Smaller, specialized manufacturers also exist in states like California and New York.   Pearls, precious stones, metals, coins ($39.81 Million) U.S. Manufacturing States: New York (diamond district), California (jewelry manufacturing), various states with smaller-scale jewelry and metal fabrication. U.S. Companies (Examples): Tiffany & Co. (New York - though much of their sourcing is global), Signet Jewelers (various brands like Kay Jewelers, Zales - some manufacturing and significant design operations in the US), smaller independent jewelers and metal smiths across the country. The US also has significant gold and silver mining in states like Nevada and Alaska, but these are raw materials. Coffee, tea, mate and spices ($38.53 Million) U.S. Manufacturing States: Washington, California, Oregon, various states with smaller coffee roasting and tea blending operations. Spice processing and packaging occur in various locations. U.S. Companies (Examples): Starbucks (Washington - roasts coffee), Peet's Coffee (California - roasts coffee), Stash Tea (Oregon - blends tea), McCormick & Company (Maryland - processes spices). Articles of apparel, not knit or crocheted ($17.95 Million)   U.S. Manufacturing States: California, New York, some production in the Carolinas and Georgia, though much has shifted overseas. U.S. Companies (Examples): American Giant (North Carolina - some domestic production), smaller fashion brands in Los Angeles and New York City that do local manufacturing. Commodities not specified according to kind ($11.60 Million) This category is too broad to specify manufacturing states or companies without more specific information on what these commodities are. It's important to note several factors: Scale of Production: The scale of US manufacturing for these categories might not fully replace the volume imported from Tanzania. Specialization: US manufacturing often focuses on specific types and qualities within these broad categories. Global Supply Chains: Many US companies rely on global supply chains, including imports, for their final products.   Raw Materials vs. Finished Goods: For precious stones and metals, Tanzania is likely exporting raw or semi-processed materials, while US manufacturing focuses on cutting, polishing, and setting them into jewelry or other products. Labor Costs: Apparel manufacturing, in particular, has largely moved overseas due to labor cost differences.   To get a more precise understanding, it would be necessary to delve into the specific subcategories within these top imports.

Investing in USA

theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters

​

Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration

​

theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

theboardiQ Logo

Economic
Relevance
Ranking

Get Great Talent. Subscribe.

Thanks for subscribing!

Info@theboardiq.com

265 Garnet Dr 

Livermore, CA 94550

  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
bottom of page