Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.
Implications
As of January 2026, the U.S. trade relationship with Syria has undergone a radical transformation. Following the collapse of the Assad regime in late 2024, the second Trump administration has moved to end decades of isolation, shifting from a policy of "maximum pressure" to one of "conditional reconstruction."
1. Latest US Tariffs & Sanctions Update
The U.S. has transitioned from comprehensive sanctions to a targeted tariff-based approach.
Tariff Fluctuations: In early 2025, the U.S. briefly imposed a 41% retaliatory tariff on Syrian goods. However, by mid-2025, this was reduced to a 10% baseline to encourage trade with the new interim government led by Ahmed al-Sharaa.
Repeal of the Caesar Act: On December 18, 2025, the FY 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) officially repealed the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act. This removed the threat of secondary sanctions for non-U.S. companies investing in Syrian infrastructure, energy, and banking
General License 25: Issued by the Treasury, this license effectively lifted primary sanctions, authorizing transactions with the Central Bank of Syria and other state-owned enterprises, provided they are not linked to "malign actors" (Assad-era figures).
2. Major Companies & Sectors Impacted
With the lifting of the Caesar Act, several industries are beginning to re-enter or eye the Syrian market:
Logistics & Shipping: DHL Express has expanded its Damascus operations to facilitate the flow of consumer goods.
Telecommunications: Syriatel Mobile Telecom was removed from the SDN list, opening the door for partnerships with international tech and infrastructure firms.
Energy: The Syrian Petroleum Company is no longer blocked. While Kurdish forces still control some northeast fields, the U.S. has signaled it may allow U.S. energy firms to assist in rehabilitating the sector.
Financial Services: Syrian banks are being re-integrated into the SWIFT network, though many Western banks (like HSBC or JPMorgan) remain cautious due to residual compliance risks.
3. GDP & Balance of Trade (BOT) Impact
Syria's economy is starting from a deeply hollowed-out base.
GDP Recovery: After a 50% contraction since 2010, the World Bank projects a modest 1-2% growth for 2026. Total reconstruction costs are estimated at $216 billion to $400 billion.
Balance of Trade (YTD 2025/26):
Total Exports (Sept 2025): $261.7 Million (Up 20.4% YoY).
Total Imports (Sept 2025): $710.4 Million (Up 42.2% YoY).
Trade Deficit: The deficit remains wide at approximately $2.1 Billion as the country imports heavy machinery and fuel for reconstruction.
U.S.-Syria Specific Trade: Nominal trade has resumed but remains in the low millions, primarily consisting of U.S. exports of vehicles and medical supplies.
4. SWOT Analysis: Syria's Market Re-entry
Strengths | Weaknesses |
* Strategic location connecting MENA & Europe. | * 90% of the population lives in poverty. |
* Significant untapped oil/gas reserves. | * Infrastructure (power/water) is 70% destroyed. |
* Highly educated diaspora returning to help. | * Extreme lack of reliable economic data. |
Opportunities | Threats |
* Massive reconstruction contracts ($400B+). | * Residual ISIS and extremist cells (Palmyra). |
* Normalization with Arab Gulf states (Saudi/UAE). | * Potential "Snapback" of U.S. sanctions. |
* Integration into the Abraham Accords. | * Conflicting UK/EU vs. US sanctions lists. |
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.
Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |