
Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

Implications
Based on the latest reports as of Friday, August 1, 2025, Switzerland has been hit with a high, country-specific tariff rate from the US, despite ongoing negotiations.
Here is a breakdown of the situation for Switzerland:
Latest US Tariffs Update
Tariff Rate: The US has announced a 39% ad valorem tariff on most Swiss goods. This is a significant increase from the 31% rate that was initially threatened in April and is more than double the 15% ceiling agreed upon for most European Union imports.
Effective Date: While the initial deadline for new tariffs was August 1, the White House has pushed the start date for most new tariffs, including Switzerland's, to August 7, 2025. This provides a one-week window for countries to try to reach a last-minute agreement.
Reasoning: The Trump administration has stated that the high tariff is a response to Switzerland's "continued lack of reciprocity" in its trade relationship with the US and a failure to make "meaningful concessions." A White House official specifically cited the US goods trade deficit with Switzerland, which was around $38.5 billion in 2024.
Deals and Agreements
No Deal Reached: Despite bilateral talks, Switzerland has not secured a deal to lower its tariff rate. Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter had a "final conversation" with President Trump before the August 1 deadline, but it was unsuccessful.
Negotiations Ongoing: The Swiss government has expressed "great regret" and "disappointment" over the new tariff, calling it "arbitrary." However, they have also stated their intention to continue negotiating with the US to find a "negotiated solution."
Impact on Companies and Industries
The 39% tariff is expected to have a severe impact on several key Swiss industries, especially those that rely heavily on the US as an export market.
Watchmaking: This is a particularly hard-hit sector. The Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry expressed disappointment, noting that Switzerland had already eliminated its own import tariffs on all industrial goods. Brands like Rolex, Patek Philippe, and Swatch will now face a significant increase in costs, which they will either have to absorb, reduce their margins on, or pass on to American consumers. The tariff could make Swiss watches prohibitively expensive and encourage US retailers to look to non-Swiss brands.
Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (Swissmem): Swissmem, an association for companies in this sector, called the tariff a "massive shock" that would hit the export economy very hard and could endanger "tens of thousands of jobs." They noted that their European competitors are facing much lower tariffs, putting Swiss companies at a significant disadvantage.
Pharmaceuticals: The pharmaceutical sector is a crucial part of Switzerland's economy and its exports to the US. While a spokesperson for the Swiss Economy Ministry stated that it is their understanding that the tariffs should not include this sector, the overall uncertainty remains high. The Trump administration has also been pressuring pharma companies like Novartis to lower drug prices in the US, which adds to the pressure on the industry.
Food Industry: Swiss chocolatiers and other food manufacturers will also be impacted. While some multinational companies like Nestlé and Lindt & Sprüngli have production lines in the US, smaller and medium-sized companies that export their products will suffer. The tariff, combined with the US dollar-Swiss franc exchange rate, could lead to a nearly 50% increase in costs, which will likely result in lower sales in the US market.
The situation remains fluid, and businesses are encouraged to stay informed of any official announcements from the U.S. and Swiss governments regarding trade policies and specific tariff rates.
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |