top of page

Sudan

US Revised Tariffs (%)

10

Ease of doing business

theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:

Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.

 

Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

david-whipple-mU-wz7JlJMc-unsplash_Ravid.jpg
Revised Tariff %
Original Tariff %
Country Tariff Rate %
Share of US Imports % (1 implies <1%)
10
10
0
1
Exports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Imports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Balance (in USD Bill.) 2024
0.06
0.01
0.04

Implications

The status of US trade with Sudan is primarily governed by sanctions and trade restrictions due to the ongoing civil war and humanitarian crisis, rather than the general "reciprocal tariff" structure imposed on most other nations.

Here is an update on the US tariffs, trade agreements, and companies' impact regarding Sudan as of October 2025:

Area

Status (October 2025)

Key Details

US Tariffs on Sudan

Under Sanction/Trade Controls

Sudan is not primarily subject to the universal US "reciprocal tariffs" (the 10% baseline for most countries), but rather to a complex set of financial sanctions and export controls administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the State Department.

Current US Trade Controls

Active Sanctions and Restrictions

The US has active sanctions under Executive Order 14098 (May 2023) and E.O. 13400 (Darfur-related), targeting individuals and entities destabilizing the country and those connected to human rights abuses.

New Export Restrictions

New prohibitions on certain goods/technology

The US State Department issued new export restrictions in June 2025, specifically prohibiting the export of certain defense articles and technology controlled for national security reasons, particularly after the US determined that the Sudanese government had used chemical weapons.

Trade Deals & Agreements

No Active Trade Agreement; No AGOA Eligibility

Sudan is not eligible for the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). While a Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) was signed with COMESA (which includes Sudan), the ongoing conflict and sanctions prevent meaningful progress.

Impact on US Companies

High-Risk/Limited Engagement

US businesses and individuals face significant illicit finance, reputational, and legal risks when operating in Sudan. Certain transactions are prohibited, and those that are permitted often require a specific OFAC license.

OFAC General Licenses

Limited Exemptions Exist

General Licenses permit certain activities, such as transactions for humanitarian efforts, food, medicine, and water provision, but non-exempt transactions require rigorous due diligence.


Key Takeaway for Sudan:

Trade with Sudan is governed less by general tariff policy and more by the US government's sanctions programs aimed at pressuring those involved in the civil war and human rights violations. US companies operate with extreme caution, primarily under licenses for humanitarian or specific permitted activities.

US Revised Tariffs

Country Tariffs

Balance of Trade

Commercial Guide

Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals

Tariff Rate for US

World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.

US Imports Guide 

United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.

Investing in USA

theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters

Sources : ForbesUSDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia International Trade Administration

theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

theboardiQ Logo

Economic
Relevance
Ranking

Get Great Talent. Subscribe.

Thanks for subscribing!

265 Garnet Dr 

Livermore, CA 94550

  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
bottom of page