top of page

South Korea

US Revised Tariffs (%)

10

Ease of doing business

theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:

Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.

 

Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

david-whipple-mU-wz7JlJMc-unsplash_Ravid.jpg
Share of US Imports % (1 implies <1%)
US Tariff %
Revised Tariff %
Country Tariff Rate %
4
25
10
5.7
Exports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Imports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Balance (in USD Bill.) 2024
65.54
131.55
-66.01

US Revised Tariffs

Country Tariffs

Balance of Trade

Commercial Guide

Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals

Tariff Rate for US

World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.

US Imports Guide 

United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.

Implications

South Korea is facing a significant shift in its trade relationship with the United States due to newly implemented tariffs. Here's a breakdown of the current situation, including trade deals and recent investment examples:   Current Tariff Update: The United States has implemented a new "reciprocal tariff" regime, which has significantly impacted South Korean exports.   25% Tariff Imposed: A 25 percent tariff has been applied to all imports from South Korea, effective April 9, 2025. This marks a major change, as South Korea had largely enjoyed duty-free access to the U.S. market under the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) since 2012.   Temporary Reduction: However, this 25 percent tariff has been temporarily reduced to 10 percent until July 9, 2025. This 90-day pause is intended to allow for tariff negotiations between the two countries. Rationale: The U.S. administration stated that these reciprocal tariffs are primarily aimed at countries with substantial trade surpluses with the United States, with the goal of potentially lowering them through negotiations. South Korea's Response: South Korea views this situation as "serious" and is actively engaging in discussions with the U.S. to minimize the damage to its industries. Acting President Lee Ju-ho has emphasized the government's commitment to protecting national interests during these talks. South Korea's chief trade negotiator departed for Washington in early April to begin formal discussions.   Financial Support: In response to these tariffs, the South Korean government has unveiled a $25 billion plan to support industries affected by the new U.S. tariff regime. This includes: $17.5 billion to support companies facing tariff-related damages or export crises. $7 billion more in subsidies for the semiconductor industry, increasing total support to $23 billion.   $2.1 billion in low-interest loans for semiconductor companies. Measures to promote the recycling of rare earths and other materials crucial for the semiconductor and battery industries, as China, a major supplier, has banned sales to the U.S. Key Trade Deals: South Korea has an extensive network of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with various countries and regions, including: United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA): Implemented in 2012 and revised in 2019, this agreement significantly reduced tariffs and trade barriers between the two countries. However, the recent U.S. tariffs represent a deviation from the FTA's original intent of duty-free trade.   EU-South Korea FTA: In effect since 2011, this agreement has eliminated most tariffs between South Korea and the European Union. China-South Korea FTA: Implemented in 2015, this FTA has strengthened economic ties between the two major Asian economies. ASEAN-Korea FTA: This agreement aims to reduce tariffs and promote economic cooperation between South Korea and the ten member states of ASEAN. Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP): South Korea is a signatory to this mega-trade agreement involving ASEAN countries plus Australia, China, Japan, New Zealand, and South Korea. Other FTAs: South Korea also has FTAs with countries like Canada, Australia, India, Chile, Turkey, the UK, and many others, demonstrating its commitment to global trade liberalization. Investments with Company Examples: South Korea has a dynamic and attractive investment environment, characterized by political stability, advanced infrastructure, a skilled workforce, and government support for foreign direct investment (FDI). Attractive Sectors: Key sectors attracting FDI include high-tech industries like semiconductors, batteries, bio-health, and ICT. Investment Climate: While generally welcoming to foreign investment, some challenges exist, such as a complicated regulatory framework and the dominance of large industrial groups (chaebols). However, the government is taking steps to improve the regulatory environment and offer incentives, particularly for investments in strategic technologies. Recent Investment Trends: Semiconductor Industry: The South Korean government is heavily investing in bolstering its semiconductor industry. For example, they are providing significant subsidies and low-interest loans to companies like Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix to expand their production capacities and R&D efforts. These companies also continue to attract foreign investment in their supply chains. Battery Industry: South Korea is a global leader in battery technology. Companies like LG Energy Solution, Samsung SDI, and SK On are making substantial investments both domestically and internationally. For instance, they are expanding production facilities in the United States to cater to the growing demand for electric vehicles, often in partnerships with U.S. automakers. Bio-Health Sector: This sector is witnessing increasing investment, with the government offering incentives for foreign companies to invest in R&D and manufacturing in South Korea. Advanced Manufacturing: Companies in automation, robotics, and advanced materials are also attracting FDI, drawn by South Korea's manufacturing prowess and skilled labor force. Real Estate and Communication: The service sector, including real estate and communication, continues to see foreign investment inflows. Example Companies with Investments: While specific recent investment deals with company names and figures change frequently, here are examples of the types of investments happening: U.S. Tech Company Investing in R&D Center: A major U.S. software company establishes a new R&D center in South Korea, focusing on artificial intelligence and machine learning, drawn by the skilled local talent and government support for innovation. European Automotive Supplier Expanding Manufacturing: A leading European automotive parts supplier invests in expanding its manufacturing facility in South Korea to better serve local automakers and potentially export to the U.S. market despite the tariffs. Chinese Battery Material Company Establishing a Plant: A Chinese company specializing in battery materials sets up a production plant in South Korea to be closer to its major South Korean battery manufacturing clients. Japanese Chemical Company Investing in Specialty Chemicals: A Japanese chemical company invests in a new facility in South Korea to produce specialty chemicals for the electronics industry, leveraging South Korea's advanced manufacturing capabilities. In conclusion, South Korea is currently navigating a challenging trade environment due to the newly imposed U.S. tariffs. While the long-term impact remains to be seen and negotiations are ongoing, South Korea's robust network of other trade agreements and its attractive investment landscape, particularly in key technology sectors, will continue to play a vital role in its global economic engagement.

US Negotiation Strategy

Based on the most recent data from 2024, the top imports to the US from South Korea by value are: Vehicles other than railway, tramway ($45.38 Billion) States with significant automotive manufacturing: Michigan (Ford, General Motors, Stellantis), California (Tesla), South Carolina (BMW, Volvo), Alabama (Mercedes-Benz, Hyundai), Tennessee (Nissan, Volkswagen), Kentucky (Toyota), Ohio (various suppliers), Indiana (various suppliers).   Machinery, nuclear reactors, boilers ($26.49 Billion) States with significant machinery manufacturing: Illinois (Caterpillar, John Deere), Ohio (various industrial machinery companies), Michigan, Wisconsin (various machinery manufacturers), Texas, California, Pennsylvania, Indiana. Electrical, electronic equipment ($20.67 Billion) States with significant electrical and electronic equipment manufacturing: California (Apple, Intel, various semiconductor companies), Texas (Samsung, Dell), Massachusetts (various tech companies), Oregon, Arizona, North Carolina. Mineral fuels, oils, distillation products ($5.10 Billion) States with significant mineral fuel processing: Texas, Louisiana, California, Alaska, Oklahoma. Plastics ($4.56 Billion) States with significant plastic and rubber product manufacturing: Texas, Ohio, California, Michigan, Indiana. It's important to note that the U.S. has a broad and diverse manufacturing base, and many states are involved in the production of goods that fall under these categories. The states listed above have particularly strong concentrations in these sectors, and the example companies are some of the major players within those states. However, numerous other companies, both large and small, contribute to the domestic production of these types of goods across the United States

Investing in USA

theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters

Sources : ForbesUSDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia International Trade Administration

theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

theboardiQ Logo

Economic
Relevance
Ranking

Get Great Talent. Subscribe.

Thanks for subscribing!

265 Garnet Dr 

Livermore, CA 94550

  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
bottom of page