top of page

South Korea

US Revised Tariffs (%)

15

Ease of doing business

theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:

Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.

 

Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

david-whipple-mU-wz7JlJMc-unsplash_Ravid.jpg
Revised Tariff %
Original Tariff %
Country Tariff Rate %
Share of US Imports % (1 implies <1%)
15
25
5.7
4
Exports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Imports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Balance (in USD Bill.) 2024
65.54
131.55
-66.01

Implications

This analysis reflects the recent, high-level trade negotiations and tariff actions between the United States and South Korea, primarily in 2025, focusing on a new framework that modifies earlier tariff impositions.1


The situation centers on a new agreement being finalized to mitigate the impact of broad U.S. tariffs imposed earlier in the year.2



🤝 Deals and Agreements: The Investment-for-Tariff Tradeoff


The core of the recent development is an agreement in which South Korea commits to a massive investment package in the U.S. in exchange for reduced U.S. tariff rates on key Korean exports.3



Key Agreements and Commitments


Area

Initial U.S. Tariff Action (Jan-Mar 2025)

Finalized/Negotiated Deal Rate

South Korean Commitment

Most Goods (Reciprocal Tariff)

25%

15% (Effective Aug 7, 2025)

$350 Billion Investment Fund (Over multiple years) into the U.S. economy.

Automobiles & Parts (Section 232)

25%

15% (Awaiting full implementation)

$200 Billion in cash/general investments (capped at $20B/year) and $150 Billion in specific investments like shipbuilding.

Steel & Aluminum

Raised to 50% (from earlier quota)

Unclear/No specific reduction announced (Still a point of contention).

Purchase of $100 billion in U.S. energy (LNG, etc.).

Semiconductors

Under consideration (Potential high tariffs)

"Not to be at a disadvantage" (Effectively, a preferential MFN status, likely around 15%).

Investment commitment includes semiconductors, batteries, and critical minerals.

Note: The reduction of the auto tariff from 25% to 15% is the most significant relief for South Korea's main export sector, bringing it in line with rates for competitors like Japan and the EU.4


⚙️ Companies and Sectors Impacted


The U.S. tariff actions and the resulting deal have had a significant, sector-specific impact on major South Korean industries.


Major Impacted Sectors


Sector

Initial Impact of High Tariffs

Impact of the New Deal (15% Rate)

Key Companies Affected

Automotive

The initial 25% tariff effectively negated the tariff-free benefit of the KORUS FTA, putting Korean automakers at a 10 percentage point disadvantage compared to Japan (15% tariff).

Major Relief. The new 15% rate restores a degree of competitive parity in the crucial U.S. market, though it is still a significant cost increase from the previous 0% FTA rate.

Hyundai Motor Group and Kia. Hyundai/Kia had already reported a substantial decline in operating profits due to absorbing the high tariffs to maintain U.S. price competitiveness.

Steel & Aluminum

The 50% tariff imposition on certain products (following the removal of prior quota exemptions) has been highly disruptive.

Ongoing Uncertainty. Steel exports have already declined. Companies are exploring establishing U.S.-based production to bypass the tariffs, driven by the investment commitment.

POSCO and Hyundai Steel.

Semiconductors & Batteries

Exposure to potential high tariffs was a major threat to South Korea's core export industry, with U.S. Section 232 investigations initiated on critical supply chain components like copper.

Strategic Advantage. The "not to be at a disadvantage" clause and the investment commitment help safeguard the supply chain for Korean firms with large U.S. manufacturing plans (e.g., for advanced batteries and chips).

Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix.


📈 GDP and Economic Impact


The primary economic impact on South Korea is derived from the tariff uncertainty and the direct cost burden before the recent deal was finalized.


Estimated Economic Effects


  • GDP Growth Impact:

    • The Bank of Korea (BOK) estimated that the uncertainty alone from U.S. tariff policy was expected to lower South Korea's GDP growth rate by -0.13 percentage points in 2025, with a potential cumulative negative impact up to -0.18 percentage points by 2028 if uncertainty persists.5


    • The BOK noted that the initial phase saw a temporary increase in exports due to "front-loading" (early shipments) in anticipation of the higher tariffs.6


  • Mitigation: The recent finalization of the deal, particularly the reduction of the comprehensive reciprocal tariff to 15% and the auto tariff to 15%, is expected to significantly mitigate the projected negative economic slowdown in the coming years.

  • Foreign Investment Shift: The $350 billion investment commitment will lead to a massive shift of South Korean capital into the U.S. economy, especially in strategic sectors like shipbuilding, nuclear, energy (LNG), and batteries.7 While this benefits the U.S., Seoul has been cautious, requesting a payment structure (loans/guarantees vs. upfront cash) and a yearly investment cap ($20 billion) to manage the impact on its own foreign-exchange markets


Here is the breakdown of South Korea's massive investment plan in the U.S., including the structure, timeline, and key sectors.


💰 South Korea's $350 Billion U.S. Investment Plan


The investment is structured to address South Korea's concerns about destabilizing its economy by committing an amount that represents a significant portion of its foreign currency reserves.


Investment Structure and Timeline


Component

Amount Committed

Structure and Terms

Rationale for South Korea

Cash / Direct Investments

$200 Billion

To be paid in installments with an annual cap of $20 billion. It may include a mix of equity investment, loans, and loan guarantees from South Korean policy financial institutions (like Korea Development Bank).

This gradual, capped approach is crucial to minimize the impact on South Korea's domestic economy and foreign exchange market, which was the primary concern with the U.S.'s initial demand for a lump-sum payment.

Shipbuilding Cooperation

$150 Billion

Dedicated to the "Make American Shipbuilding Great Again (MASGA)" initiative. This will fund a full ecosystem approach, including shipbuilding, maintenance/repair (MRO), and related equipment.

A strategic, targeted investment that directly addresses a U.S. national security priority, which helped unlock the tariff reduction on auto exports.

Profit Sharing

Varies

The two sides reportedly agreed to 50/50 profit splitting before the initial investments are recouped, and to only pursue commercially viable projects.

Provides a critical safeguard for South Korean companies, ensuring the commitment is not a purely political transfer of wealth.


🏭 Targeted Sectors and Strategic Focus


The investment is heavily focused on key, high-tech, and strategic industries that align with both U.S. domestic manufacturing goals and South Korea's major export strengths.


1. 🚢 Shipbuilding ($150 Billion Focus)


  • Goal: To revitalize the U.S. shipbuilding industry, including the construction of new shipyards, modernizing existing facilities, training the U.S. workforce, and rebuilding supply chains.

  • Significance: This is a major U.S. strategic priority often cited under Section 232 investigations, and the commitment is seen as South Korea's most valuable non-tariff concession.


2. 💾 Advanced Industries ($200 Billion Focus)


This component covers investments in high-growth, high-value sectors:

  • Semiconductors & Chips: Essential for securing preferential tariff treatment for the industry and supporting the U.S. goal of boosting domestic chip production.

  • Batteries & Electric Vehicles (EVs): Support for the advanced battery supply chain, which includes investments by major Korean firms like LG Energy Solution and SK On in the U.S.

  • Critical Minerals: Investment into the mining, processing, and refining of essential minerals needed for the battery and semiconductor supply chains.

  • Nuclear Energy & Power Grid: Includes cooperation on nuclear energy and a potential $3 billion investment in U.S. power-grid infrastructure, aligning with U.S. energy security goals.

  • Biotechnology (Bio-Tech) and AI.


3. ⚡ Energy & Purchases


  • South Korea has committed to purchasing $100 billion worth of U.S. energy products, primarily Liquid Natural Gas (LNG).


⚠️ Implementation and Operational Hurdles


Despite the agreement, significant operational issues have complicated the execution of the investment plan:

  • Immigration and Visas: A major sticking point arose over the security and predictability of bringing in skilled South Korean technical workers (engineers, managers) on short-term visas to build and operate the new industrial sites. Incidents of aggressive immigration enforcement have caused Seoul to seek formal assurances from the U.S. government on worker mobility and protection.

  • Currency Concerns: South Korea had sought an unlimited currency swap line with the U.S. to manage the large and recurring capital outflow required for the investment, arguing it's necessary to maintain the stability of the Korean won and its foreign exchange reserves.


The success of the deal in providing long-term stability for South Korean companies hinges on the predictable, safe, and commercially viable deployment of this enormous capital commitment.

US Revised Tariffs

Country Tariffs

Balance of Trade

Commercial Guide

Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals

Tariff Rate for US

World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.

US Imports Guide 

United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.

Investing in USA

theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters

Sources : ForbesUSDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia International Trade Administration

theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

theboardiQ Logo

Economic
Relevance
Ranking

Get Great Talent. Subscribe.

Thanks for subscribing!

265 Garnet Dr 

Livermore, CA 94550

  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
bottom of page