top of page

Saudi Arabia

US Revised Tariffs (%)

10

Ease of doing business

theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:

Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.

 

Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

david-whipple-mU-wz7JlJMc-unsplash_Ravid.jpg
Share of US Imports % (1 implies <1%)
US Tariff %
Revised Tariff %
Country Tariff Rate %
1
10
10
5.4
Exports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Imports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Balance (in USD Bill.) 2024
13.18
12.73
0.44

Implications

As of July 2025, the trade relationship between the United States and Saudi Arabia is complex, characterized by both existing strong ties and the looming impact of new U.S. tariff policies.


New US Tariffs Affecting Saudi Arabia:


While specific reciprocal tariff rates for Saudi Arabia haven't been explicitly detailed in the same way as some other countries, the U.S. administration has signaled a broad approach to tariffs:


  • Reciprocal Tariffs: The U.S. has been sending letters to various countries, including close allies, to inform them of reciprocal tariff rates that will come into effect on August 1, 2025. These tariffs are part of a strategy to address what the U.S. views as imbalanced trade relationships. The rates can vary significantly, ranging from 10-20% on the lower end to 60-70% on the higher end, depending on the outcome of bilateral negotiations.

  • Copper Tariff: A notable new tariff announced is a 50% tariff on copper imports, effective August 1, 2025. While not exclusively targeting Saudi Arabia, this will impact any copper imports from the Kingdom. This tariff is justified by the U.S. as a measure to rebuild its domestic copper industry and enhance national security.

  • "Anti-American BRICS Policies" Surcharge: The U.S. has warned that any country aligning with "Anti-American BRICS policies" may face an additional 10% tariff. Saudi Arabia is a member of the BRICS group, and this potential surcharge could add another layer of complexity to their trade relations.


Status of Deals and Agreements:


Despite the new tariff landscape, the U.S. and Saudi Arabia continue to engage in significant economic cooperation and maintain existing agreements:


  • Strong Economic Partnership: The U.S. and Saudi Arabia share a long-standing economic relationship. In 2024, total goods trade between the two nations reached an estimated $25.9 billion, with U.S. exports at $13.2 billion and imports at $12.7 billion.

  • Saudi Investment in the U.S.: Saudi Arabia has made substantial commitments to invest in the United States. In May 2025, during a visit by President Donald Trump, Saudi Arabia announced a $600 billion commitment to invest in the U.S. across various sectors, including AI data centers, energy infrastructure, and defense. This includes specific investment funds like a $5 billion Energy Investment Fund and a $5 billion New Era Aerospace and Defense Technology Fund.

  • Defense Sales: The U.S. and Saudi Arabia have a robust defense partnership, with a historic $142 billion defense sales agreement providing Saudi Arabia with advanced equipment and services from U.S. defense firms.

  • Sectoral Cooperation: Both countries are actively collaborating in diverse fields, including:
    Energy and Sustainability: Focused on securing global energy markets and transitioning to renewables, including critical minerals.
    Financial Services: Mobilizing capital and accelerating FinTech innovation.
    AI and Technology: Building a digital alliance in AI, cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, and advanced computing. Saudi Arabian DataVolt is investing $20 billion in AI data centers in the U.S.
    Industry and Manufacturing: Driving high-tech production in areas like aerospace and automotive.
    Healthcare and Life Sciences: Advancing medical technologies and research.

  • Ongoing Bilateral Negotiations: The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) has been leading bilateral negotiations with trading partners, and while specific details for Saudi Arabia are not fully public, the extension of the tariff pause until August 1, 2025, suggests that discussions are ongoing.


Impact on Companies:


The new tariffs, particularly the reciprocal tariffs and the copper tariff, could impact companies engaged in U.S.-Saudi trade:

  • Increased Costs for Importers: U.S. companies importing goods from Saudi Arabia that fall under the new tariff categories will face higher costs, which could be passed on to consumers or impact profit margins.

  • Supply Chain Adjustments: Companies may need to re-evaluate their supply chains to mitigate the impact of tariffs, potentially seeking alternative sources or adjusting production strategies.

  • Strategic Investments Continue: Despite the tariffs, the substantial Saudi investments in the U.S. signal a continued commitment to strengthening economic ties, which could benefit U.S. companies involved in those specific projects and sectors (e.g., AI, energy, defense, infrastructure).

  • U.S. Companies in Saudi Arabia: Iconic American companies like Hill International, Jacobs, Parsons, and AECOM are actively involved in significant infrastructure projects in Saudi Arabia, benefiting from the Kingdom's Vision 2030 initiatives. These companies are likely to continue their operations there.

  • Tech Partnerships: U.S. tech giants such as Google, Oracle, Salesforce, AMD, and Uber are committing to substantial investments in transformative technologies in both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia, indicating ongoing collaboration despite trade policy shifts.


In summary, while the U.S. is implementing new tariffs that will affect trade with Saudi Arabia from August 1, 2025, the broader economic relationship remains multifaceted, with significant existing investments and ongoing cooperation in key strategic sectors. The precise impact will depend on the final reciprocal tariff rates applied to Saudi goods and the extent to which ongoing negotiations lead to agreements.

US Revised Tariffs

Country Tariffs

Balance of Trade

Commercial Guide

Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals

Tariff Rate for US

World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.

US Imports Guide 

United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.

Investing in USA

theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters

Sources : ForbesUSDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia International Trade Administration

theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

theboardiQ Logo

Economic
Relevance
Ranking

Get Great Talent. Subscribe.

Thanks for subscribing!

265 Garnet Dr 

Livermore, CA 94550

  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
bottom of page