Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.
Implications
The U.S.-Qatar trade relationship in October 2025 is characterized by the application of the general US tariffs alongside significant Qatari investment and commercial commitments to the US. Qatar is one of the countries that has not secured a specific bilateral trade agreement to lower its tariff rate.
Here is an update on US Tariffs, Deals, and Impacts for Qatar:
US Tariffs on Qatar
Area | Status (October 2025) | Key Details |
Reciprocal US Tariff Rate | 10% (Implemented) | Qatar is currently subject to the 10% universal baseline reciprocal tariff imposed on all non-sanctioned countries that have not concluded a specific trade agreement with the U.S. |
Bilateral Tariff Deal | None Finalized | Qatar has not announced a new bilateral trade agreement with the U.S. to exempt it from or reduce the reciprocal tariff, unlike countries like the UK, Japan, and the EU. |
Other Tariffs | Sector-Specific Duties Apply | Qatari imports are also subject to any globally applied tariffs, such as the 25% duty on steel and aluminum (which was set at 50% globally, but at 25% for most countries, and can apply to certain Qatari exports if they contain these materials). |
Deals and Agreements (Focus on Investment)
While no tariff-specific trade agreement has been signed, Qatar has deepened its commercial relationship with the U.S. through massive investment and purchase commitments:
Historic Economic Commitment: In May 2025, a significant agreement was signed that included an economic exchange commitment valued at over $1.2 trillion and deals totaling over $243.5 billion.
Aerospace & Jobs: Key deals include major acquisitions by Qatar Airways of Boeing aircraft and GE Aerospace engines, which are projected to support over a million U.S. jobs during the course of production and delivery.
Defense & Technology: Other agreements cover advanced defense systems (e.g., from Raytheon and General Atomics) and a substantial investment in U.S. quantum technology through a joint venture.
Companies and Business Impact
The impact on Qatari and U.S. companies is twofold:
Increased Cost on Exports: Qatari goods imported into the U.S. that are not already duty-free are subject to the 10% baseline tariff, increasing costs for Qatari exporters and U.S. importers. This particularly affects Qatari non-energy exports.
Strategic Investment Outweighs Tariffs: The substantial Qatari investment and procurement deals appear to be a strategy to deepen economic ties and leverage with the U.S. administration, mitigating the impact of the tariffs.
U.S. Companies: Companies like Boeing, GE Aerospace, and U.S. defense contractors are major beneficiaries of the large-scale Qatari procurements and investments, which directly support U.S. manufacturing and jobs.
Qatari Companies: Businesses importing goods from the U.S. face no new tariffs, as the reciprocal duties are on U.S. imports. However, Qatari businesses that export to the U.S. must absorb or pass on the 10% tariff cost.
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.
Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |