
Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

Implications
As of January 2026, the trade relationship between the United States and Qatar remains strategically strong, primarily driven by long-term energy contracts and massive aviation deals. While the U.S. has implemented a general tariff posture affecting various global partners, Qatar’s primary exports—Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and energy-related derivatives—remain largely exempt or insulated due to existing strategic agreements.
## Latest US Tariffs & Trade Updates (2026)
Blanket Tariffs: The Trump administration has proposed a baseline tariff (10% to 20%) on all imports not covered by specific trade agreements.
Sectoral Exemptions: Critical energy imports and high-tech infrastructure materials used in U.S. domestic development often receive "use-based exclusions."
Greenland Dispute Tariffs: As of early 2026, a 10% tariff (rising to 25% by June) has been targeted at specific European nations involved in the Greenland acquisition dispute; Qatar is currently not a target of these specific punitive measures.
Strategic Dialogue: The 7th US-Qatar Strategic Dialogue (held late 2025) reinforced exemptions for Qatari energy products to ensure "global energy abundance."
## Major Companies Impacted
The impact is bifurcated: Qatari firms face potential costs on non-energy exports (like aluminum), while U.S. firms benefit from massive Qatari procurement.
Company | Impact Status | Nature of Impact |
Qatar Airways | High (Positive) | Recently signed a $96B deal for Boeing 787s and 777Xs; largely exempt from aircraft parts tariffs. |
QatarEnergy | Low (Neutral) | LNG exports remain the backbone of trade; exempt from most "national security" energy tariffs. |
Boeing / GE | High (Positive) | Major beneficiaries of Qatari aviation and engine contracts, supporting ~150,000 U.S. jobs. |
QAMCO (Aluminum) | Medium (Negative) | Qatar’s raw aluminum exports face standard 25% Section 232 tariffs unless specific exemptions are granted. |
Parsons / McDermott | High (Positive) | Secured billions ($97B and $8.5B respectively) in infrastructure and energy contracts in Qatar. |
## GDP & Balance of Trade (BOT) Impact
GDP Impact: Minimal. Qatar’s real GDP growth is projected at 5.3% for 2026, driven by the North Field LNG expansion. Because exports to the U.S. are a small fraction of Qatar's total global exports (which favor Asia), U.S. tariffs do not significantly move their GDP needle.
Trade Balance (YTD 2025/26):
The U.S. maintains a Trade Surplus with Qatar (approx. $2.0B - $2.5B annually).
Latest YTD (Monthly average): U.S. exports to Qatar average ~$220M/month, while imports from Qatar average ~$90M/month.
Top U.S. Exports: Aircraft parts, Gas turbines, and Cars.
Top Qatari Exports to U.S.: Refined petroleum, Nitrogenous fertilizers, and Raw aluminum.
## SWOT Analysis: Qatar-US Trade (2026)
Strengths | Weaknesses |
* "Major Non-NATO Ally" status provides a diplomatic buffer. | * Heavy reliance on hydrocarbon exports. |
* Massive sovereign wealth fund (QIA) investments in U.S. tech. | * Vulnerability to global shipping lane disruptions. |
* Long-term, fixed energy contracts provide stability. | * Limited non-energy manufacturing base. |
Opportunities | Threats |
* Expansion into U.S. Quantum Computing ($1B JV). | * Potential for 25% blanket tariffs if trade tensions escalate. |
* Hosting/Supporting the 2026 FIFA World Cup in the U.S. | * Global shift toward renewables lowering long-term gas demand. |
* Streamlining of U.S. regulatory processes for Qatari FDI. | * Regional geopolitical volatility impacting transit. |
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |