Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.
Implications
As of January 2026, the trade relationship between the United States and Papua New Guinea (PNG) is navigating a period of significant global tariff volatility. While the U.S. has implemented broad "reciprocal" tariffs under the current administration, the direct impact on PNG remains relatively contained compared to major Asian and European economies.
1. Latest US Tariffs Update (2026)
In late 2025 and early 2026, the U.S. administration implemented a 10% baseline reciprocal tariff on most trading partners, including Papua New Guinea.
Status of PNG: PNG is subject to the 10% blanket tariff on general goods. Unlike some Pacific neighbors like Fiji (facing up to 32% on certain items), PNG has not been targeted with specific punitive rates.
Exemptions: While certain Pacific nations (like Palau and Niue) received exemptions, PNG currently does not. However, most of PNG's primary exports to the U.S. fall under categories that are less price-sensitive or have limited domestic U.S. competition.
Secondary Effects: The larger threat to PNG comes from "secondary tariffs" on its major trading partners—China and Australia. If demand for PNG's raw materials (LNG, Copper) drops in those countries due to U.S. pressure, PNG's economy suffers indirectly.
2. Major Companies Impacted
The impact is divided between U.S.-led resource giants and local agricultural exporters:
Company | Sector | Nature of Impact |
ExxonMobil / Santos | Energy (LNG) | Limited direct tariff impact on gas, but high exposure to global price volatility caused by trade wars. |
Newmont Corporation | Mining (Gold) | Benefiting from gold's "safe haven" status during trade tensions, offsetting operational tariff costs. |
BSP Financial Group | Banking | Indirectly impacted by reduced regional trade flows and foreign exchange liquidity. |
Monpi Coffee / Agmark | Agriculture | Facing the 10% U.S. entry tariff; however, high global demand for PNG's specialty coffee and cocoa helps absorb the cost. |
PNG Ports Corp | Infrastructure | Potential slowdown in shipping volumes if regional trade between China and the West cools further. |
3. GDP & Balance of Trade (BOT) YTD
PNG's economy remains resilient, largely due to high gold prices and the reopening of the Porgera mine.
GDP Impact: The IMF and ADB project a slight moderation in growth to 3.6% – 3.8% for 2026. While the U.S. tariffs themselves only shave an estimated 0.1% - 0.2% off direct GDP, the "geoeconomic risk" (global uncertainty) is a larger drag on investment.
Balance of Trade (BOT) YTD:
U.S. Exports to PNG: ~$14M/month (primarily aircraft parts and specialized machinery).
PNG Exports to U.S.: ~$7M/month (primarily coffee, cocoa, and vanilla).
Trend: The U.S. maintains a trade surplus with PNG. YTD 2026 data shows PNG's export value to the U.S. has grown by ~30% in nominal terms, largely driven by record-high cocoa and coffee prices rather than volume.
4. SWOT Analysis: Economy 2026
Strengths | Weaknesses |
* Resource Wealth: Significant gold, copper, and LNG reserves. | * Infrastructure: High costs of doing business; frequent power outages. |
* Agricultural Quality: High-value niche exports (Specialty Coffee/Vanilla). | * FX Shortages: Persistent difficulty in accessing foreign currency. |
* Fiscal Reform: Committed to a "balanced budget" path by 2027. | * Law & Order: Internal security challenges impacting mine operations. |
Opportunities | Threats |
* New Projects: Papua LNG and Wafi-Golpu mine reaching Final Investment Decisions (FID). | * US-China Trade War: PNG could be "collateral damage" if China's demand for copper/gas drops. |
* Digitalization: Expansion of undersea cables and mobile banking (BSP). | * FATF "Grey Listing": Increased monitoring of financial flows could slow FDI. |
* Green Energy: Potential for geothermal and hydro investment. | * Climate Change: Vulnerability to natural disasters affecting agriculture. |
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.
Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |