top of page

Norway

US Revised Tariffs (%)

10

Ease of doing business

theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:

Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.

 

Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

david-whipple-mU-wz7JlJMc-unsplash_Ravid.jpg
Share of US Imports % (1 implies <1%)
US Tariff %
Revised Tariff %
Country Tariff Rate %
1
15
10
2.3
Exports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Imports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Balance (in USD Bill.) 2024
4.59
6.58
-1.99

Implications

As of July 10, 2025, Norway has received a temporary reprieve from the latest round of escalating US tariffs. While an initial 15% tariff on Norwegian goods imported into the US was announced in April 2025, and a 16% tariff was later reported, Norway did not receive a notification letter from the US regarding new tariff levels that were set to take effect on July 9, 2025, for other countries. This means any changes to Norway's current trade terms are deferred until August 1, 2025.


Status of Deals and Agreements:


  • No specific bilateral trade deal has been finalized between the US and Norway to address the new reciprocal tariffs.

  • The US has been engaging in bilateral negotiations with various trading partners, but information on the status of these discussions, particularly with Norway, remains limited.

  • Norway is not a member of the EU customs union but is tied to the EU through the European Economic Area (EEA) agreement. This means Norway is not exempt from US tariffs, and could potentially be affected by any EU countermeasures if they were to target US goods also imported by Norway.

  • Norway has consistently advocated for a rules-based world trade system and has expressed a preference for aligning with the EU's efforts to maintain such a system, rather than pursuing a separate bilateral deal with the US, though they are keeping their options open.

  • The U.S.-Norway Supplementary Defense Cooperation Agreement entered into force in June 2022, modernizing the framework for visiting U.S. forces and reflecting shared NATO commitments. This highlights the broader strategic relationship beyond trade.


Impact on Companies:


  • Norwegian companies have been preparing for potential impacts, with some exploring options like moving storage and production operations to mitigate the effects of higher tariffs.

  • While the direct effect of US tariffs on the overall Norwegian economy is considered relatively minor due to the US accounting for a small percentage (around 3%) of total Norwegian exports, certain sectors could be more vulnerable.

  • Seafood, especially Norwegian salmon, makes up a significant portion of exports to the US. Higher tariffs on these products could impact their popularity and demand in the US.

  • Companies in sectors like metals (e.g., Norsk Hydro), which produce aluminum and steel, were initially concerned about higher tariffs on their exports to the US.


Norway's Response:


  • Norwegian Minister of Trade and Industry Cecilie Myrseth stated that Norway did not receive a letter about new tariff levels being implemented on July 9, and thus no further increase in tariff rates will occur before August 1st.

  • The Norwegian government's stance is that escalating a trade conflict by introducing counter-tariffs against the US would not benefit the country.

  • Norwegian officials, including Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre and Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg, have consistently expressed that increased trade barriers are not in anyone's long-term interest and would harm the global economy.

  • They have also emphasized the importance of their trade agreement with the EU and that Norway is unlikely to compromise on standards (e.g., genetically modified food) to secure a separate deal with the US.

  • There have been discussions within Norway, including in leading financial newspapers, about the possibility of Norway aligning with the EU's "trade bazooka", which could include measures like preventing US firms from bidding for public contracts or even banning their operations within the EU/EEA.


The situation remains fluid, with ongoing conversations between Norway and the US, and the August 1st deadline for potential new tariffs looming.

US Revised Tariffs

Country Tariffs

Balance of Trade

Commercial Guide

Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals

Tariff Rate for US

World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.

US Imports Guide 

United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.

Investing in USA

theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters

Sources : ForbesUSDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia International Trade Administration

theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

theboardiQ Logo

Economic
Relevance
Ranking

Get Great Talent. Subscribe.

Thanks for subscribing!

265 Garnet Dr 

Livermore, CA 94550

  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
bottom of page