top of page

Mexico

US Revised Tariffs (%)

10

Ease of doing business

theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:

Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.

 

Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

david-whipple-mU-wz7JlJMc-unsplash_Ravid.jpg
Share of US Imports % (1 implies <1%)
US Tariff %
Revised Tariff %
Country Tariff Rate %
15.2
25
10
1.6
Exports (in USD Mill.) 2024
Imports (in USD Mill.) 2024
Balance (in USD Mill.) 2024
334041.4
505850.6
-171809.2

US Revised Tariffs

Country Tariffs

Balance of Trade

Commercial Guide

Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals

Tariff Rate for US

World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.

US Imports Guide 

United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.

Implications

As of May 9, 2025, the trade relationship between Mexico and the United States is complex and subject to recent changes. Here's a breakdown of the current situation:   USMCA Status: The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which replaced NAFTA, remains in force. It generally maintains zero tariffs on most goods traded between the three countries.   The first joint review of the USMCA is scheduled for July 1, 2026, to determine whether the agreement will be extended.   Recent Tariff Developments Involving the US and Mexico: New US Tariffs Imposed: Effective March 4, 2025, the United States imposed a 25% tariff on most imports from Mexico, citing national security concerns related to illegal immigration and fentanyl trafficking. Energy products from Mexico are also subject to this 25% tariff.   USMCA Exemptions Initially Delayed, Now Indefinite: Tariffs on goods qualifying under the USMCA rules of origin were initially delayed but, as of March 7, 2025, are exempt from these additional tariffs. This covers a significant portion of trade, including automobiles and parts, and produce.   Mexico's Response: Initially, Mexico indicated it would delay its retaliatory measures. However, President Sheinbaum announced that if the US tariffs remained, Mexico would implement countermeasures, including retaliatory tariffs. The details of "Plan B," Mexico's potential response, have not been fully disclosed.   Reciprocal Tariffs by the US: President Trump announced that reciprocal tariffs would go into effect on April 2, 2025. These tariffs aim to counter what the US perceives as non-reciprocal trade practices. However, as of the latest updates, goods from Canada and Mexico that comply with USMCA are not subject to these reciprocal tariffs. Non-USMCA compliant goods from Mexico face a baseline tariff. Steel and Aluminum Tariffs: As of March 12, 2025, a 25% tariff is also in effect on global steel and aluminum imports, which would include those from Mexico not qualifying under USMCA.   Temporary Pause on Some Tariffs: As of April 9, 2025, the US has temporarily suspended most new import duties for 90 days, with the pause set to expire on July 8, 2025. However, the 25% tariffs on some Canadian and Mexican goods (those not USMCA compliant), automobiles, and imported steel and aluminum remain in place.   Key Points to Consider: Ongoing Trade War: The imposition of tariffs by the US and the potential for Mexican retaliation indicate an ongoing trade conflict despite the existence of the USMCA. USMCA as a Partial Shield: The USMCA provides a significant level of tariff-free trade for goods meeting its rules of origin, offering some protection against the broader tariffs.   Monitoring Government Policies: Given the dynamic nature of the situation, it is crucial to closely monitor policy changes and announcements from both the US and Mexican governments that could impact trade. Potential for Further Changes: The trade relationship remains fluid, and further tariffs or changes in policy are possible. The reciprocal tariffs announced by the US could evolve, and Mexico's response may materialize. Other Trade Agreements: Mexico and the European Union concluded negotiations for a modernized Global Agreement on January 17, 2025. This agreement aims to boost trade and investment opportunities, securing sustainable access to raw materials and offering benefits for EU and Mexican businesses, including in agriculture, services, and public procurement.   In summary, while the USMCA is in place, a trade conflict initiated by new US tariffs on Mexican imports is ongoing. Goods qualifying under USMCA are currently exempt from these tariffs, but the situation remains subject to change, with potential for Mexican retaliation and further adjustments in US trade policy. Mexico is also actively pursuing trade diversification through agreements like the updated deal with the EU.

US Negotiation Strategy

Based on 2024 data, the top imports to the US from Mexico by value are: Vehicles other than railway, tramway ($137.23 Billion) Machinery, nuclear reactors, boilers ($105.83 Billion) Electrical, electronic equipment ($87.56 Billion) Optical, photo, technical, medical apparatus ($22.92 Billion) Mineral fuels, oils, distillation products ($16.85 Billion) Here's a general overview of U.S. states with significant manufacturing in these sectors, and thus capable of producing similar goods: Vehicles other than railway, tramway: Michigan: The traditional hub of the U.S. automotive industry. California: Significant automotive presence, especially electric vehicles and parts. South Carolina: Major manufacturing hub for BMW, Volvo, etc. Alabama: Home to Mercedes-Benz, Hyundai, and other manufacturers.   Tennessee: Nissan and Volkswagen have facilities here. Other states with a strong automotive presence include Ohio, Indiana, and Kentucky.   Machinery, nuclear reactors, boilers: Illinois: Known for manufacturing industrial machinery.   Ohio: Diverse manufacturing sector including machinery. Michigan: Also manufactures industrial machinery alongside vehicles.   Wisconsin: Strong manufacturing base in various types of machinery.   Other states include Texas, California, Pennsylvania, and Indiana. Electrical, electronic equipment: California: Major center for technology and electronics, especially semiconductors and computer equipment.   Texas: Growing technology and electronics manufacturing sector.   Massachusetts: Strong in electronics and high-tech manufacturing. Other states include Oregon, Arizona, and North Carolina. Optical, photo, technical, medical apparatus: Massachusetts: A hub for medical device manufacturing and research.   California: Strong in medical devices and biotechnology.   Minnesota: Known as "Medical Alley" with a high concentration of medical device companies.   Other states include Florida, Pennsylvania, and Indiana. Mineral fuels, oils, distillation products: Texas: Leading state in oil and gas production and refining.   Louisiana: Significant oil and gas industry.   California: Has oil and gas production and refining.   Other states with oil and gas activities include Alaska, Oklahoma, and North Dakota.   It's important to note that while these states have the capacity to manufacture similar types of goods, the specific products, production volumes, and the degree to which they directly compete with Mexican imports can vary significantly. Global supply chains are intricate, and even within the same category, specialization and component sourcing can differ. Additionally, factors like cost competitiveness and established trade relationships play a crucial role in import patterns.

Investing in USA

theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters

Sources : ForbesUSDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia International Trade Administration

theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

theboardiQ Logo

Economic
Relevance
Ranking

Get Great Talent. Subscribe.

Thanks for subscribing!

265 Garnet Dr 

Livermore, CA 94550

  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
bottom of page