
Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

Implications
The trade relationship between the U.S. and Malaysia has entered a volatile new phase. Following a series of blanket and reciprocal tariffs in 2025, the two nations reached a landmark Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) in late 2025.
Here is the latest update on the situation as of January 2026.
1. Latest US Tariffs Update (2025–2026)
After a period of "tariff warfare" in early 2025 where rates fluctuated between 24% and 25%, a stabilization agreement was reached.
Current Reciprocal Rate: The U.S. maintains a 19% reciprocal tariff rate on most Malaysian imports.
Zero-Percent List: Specific products listed in "Annex III" of Executive Order 14346 (Sept 2025) enjoy a 0% rate. These primarily include critical minerals and specific high-tech components.
Effective Rate: For many exporters in the semiconductor and aerospace sectors, the effective rate is estimated at approximately 11.9% due to various exclusions.
Sectoral Hits: In October 2025, additional 25% Section 232 tariffs were imposed on upholstered furniture, kitchen cabinets, and vanities.
2. Major Companies & Sectors Impacted
Sector | Impact Level | Key Companies Affected / Involved |
Semiconductors | High | Intel, AMD, Infineon, Inari Amertron, ViTrox |
Electronics (E&E) | High | Venture Corp, Jabil, Celestica (Malaysia operations) |
Furniture | Severe | Lii Hen Industries, Poh Huat Resources, Homeritz |
Rubber/Medical | Moderate | Top Glove, Hartalega, Kossan Rubber |
Aerospace | Low/Managed | Spirit AeroSystems (Malaysia), Boeing suppliers |
3. GDP & Balance of Trade (BOT) Impact
The trade friction has created a noticeable drag on Malaysia's macroeconomic outlook for 2026.
GDP Impact: Economists estimate that sustained U.S. tariffs could drag Malaysia’s GDP growth down by 0.6 to 1.2 percentage points. While 2025 growth remained resilient, 2026 is projected to slow to the 4.0% – 4.5% range.
Latest Country BOT (YTD 2025 Recap): * Malaysia achieved a record total trade of RM 3.06 trillion in 2025.
2025 Surplus: RM 151.8 billion (approx. $35.8B USD).
YTD 2026 (Jan): Early data shows a trade surplus of RM 19.3 billion for Dec 2025/Jan 2026, though export growth to the U.S. is expected to moderate to ~4.5% (down from previous double-digit forecasts).
4. SWOT Analysis: Malaysia-US Trade (2026)
STRENGTHS | WEAKNESSES |
* E&E Hub: Malaysia accounts for ~7% of global semiconductor trade and 13% of global backend testing/packaging. | * High Export Concentration: ~7.5% of Malaysia's total GDP is tied directly to U.S. exports. |
* Established Infrastructure: Strong supply chain ecosystems in Penang and Kulim. | * Commodity Sensitivity: Reliance on oil and gas exports makes revenue vulnerable to global price swings. |
OPPORTUNITIES | THREATS |
* Trade Diversification: Increasing focus on BRICS+ and Middle Eastern markets to reduce U.S. dependency. | * U.S. "Re-shoring" Policy: Aggressive U.S. incentives to bring manufacturing back to American soil. |
* China+1 Strategy: Continued FDI from companies seeking to bypass direct U.S.-China trade war tariffs. | * Transshipment Scrutiny: Increased U.S. Customs (CBP) focus on "Made in Malaysia" labels used to mask Chinese origin. |
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |