top of page

Malawi

US Revised Tariffs (%)

10

Ease of doing business

theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:

Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.

 

Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

david-whipple-mU-wz7JlJMc-unsplash_Ravid.jpg
Share of US Imports % (1 implies <1%)
US Tariff %
Revised Tariff %
Country Tariff Rate %
1
17
10
6
Exports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Imports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Balance (in USD Bill.) 2024
0.03
0.04
-0.01

US Revised Tariffs

Country Tariffs

Balance of Trade

Commercial Guide

Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals

Tariff Rate for US

World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.

US Imports Guide 

United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.

Implications

As of Sunday, April 20, 2025, here's the latest information regarding tariffs and trade involving Malawi: Malawi's General Tariff Structure: Malawi's trade policy aims to become a globally competitive, export-oriented economy.   The average tariff rates in Malawi have historically been relatively low compared to some other countries. In 2021, the trade-weighted average tariff rate for all products imported into Malawi was 5.95%. The simple average tariff across all products was 9.48%. The maximum tariff rate on any product was 25%.   A significant portion (46.59% in 2021) of imports into Malawi were duty-free.   Malawi is a member of the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA). Trade within COMESA is generally subject to lower or no tariffs under the regional trade agreements.   Recent Global Tariff Changes and Malawi: In early April 2025, the United States announced a 10% baseline reciprocal tariff on nearly all trading partners. An additional individualized reciprocal tariff was announced for 57 specific countries. Malawi was listed as one of the 57 countries subject to an additional "reciprocal tariff" by the United States. The announced reciprocal tariff rate for Malawi was 18%. This was to be added to the baseline 10% tariff.   However, on April 9, 2025, the U.S. implemented a 90-day pause on these additional reciprocal tariffs for most countries, including Malawi. During this 90-day pause, it is assumed that the tariff rate for goods from Malawi entering the U.S. has reverted to the baseline 10%. Malawi is also a beneficiary of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), which provides preferential, often duty-free, access to the U.S. market for many qualifying products. This preference is currently set to expire in September 2025 unless extended. Malawi-U.S. Trade Relationship: Total U.S. goods trade with Malawi in 2024 was $68.0 million. U.S. goods exports to Malawi were $26.9 million. U.S. goods imports from Malawi were $41.1 million. Principal U.S. exports to Malawi include lab reagents, vaccines, locomotives, and medical instruments. Principal U.S. imports from Malawi include raw tobacco, raw sugar, tea, and nuts. The U.S. generally runs a trade deficit with Malawi. In 2024, this deficit was $14.1 million.   In 2023, U.S. imports from Malawi totaled $44.6 million. Key Takeaways for Tariffs on Malawi (April 20, 2025): Malawi's own tariffs are generally low, with an average weighted rate of around 6% in recent years. The United States currently imposes a 10% baseline tariff on most goods from Malawi due to a recent (and largely paused) reciprocal tariff action. Many Malawian products entering the U.S. may also benefit from duty-free access under AGOA. The trade relationship between the U.S. and Malawi is relatively small in the overall global context. It's important to note that international trade policies can change, and specific tariff rates depend on the Harmonized System (HS) code of the product. For the most precise and up-to-date information, it is advisable to consult official tariff schedules and trade authorities in both Malawi and the United States.

US Negotiation Strategy

Based on the most recent data (2024) from Trading Economics, the top imports to the US from Malawi by value are: Tobacco and manufactures tobacco substitutes ($18.03 Million) Coffee, tea, mate and spices ($10.91 Million) Sugars and sugar confectionery ($8.37 Million) Edible fruits, nuts, peel of citrus fruit, melons ($5.01 Million) Animal, vegetable fats and oils, cleavage products ($144.51 Thousand) Manufacturers of plaiting material, basketwork ($143.21 Thousand) Electrical, electronic equipment ($65.33 Thousand) Commodities not specified according to kind ($65.20 Thousand) Edible vegetables and certain roots and tubers ($54.68 Thousand) Other made textile articles, sets, worn clothing ($45.00 Thousand) Now, let's look at which states in the US can manufacture similar products, along with some example companies: Tobacco and manufactures tobacco substitutes: North Carolina: A historical leader in tobacco production and manufacturing. Examples include Altria Group (Philip Morris USA) and Reynolds American (R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company).   Kentucky: Another state with a significant history in tobacco farming and processing. Virginia: Also has a historical connection to the tobacco industry.   Coffee, tea, mate and spices: While the US doesn't commercially grow tea or coffee on a large scale in most states (Hawaii has some coffee production), many states have companies that process, roast, and package these goods. California: Numerous specialty coffee roasters and tea companies. Examples include Peet's Coffee and Stash Tea.   Washington: Another hub for coffee roasting. Example: Starbucks (though primarily retail, they have significant roasting operations).   New York: Home to various tea and spice importers and processors. Example: McCormick & Company (though headquartered in Maryland, has NY operations).   Sugars and sugar confectionery: Florida: Produces sugarcane and has sugar processing facilities. Example: Florida Crystals.   Louisiana: Also a significant sugarcane-producing state. Example: American Sugar Refining, Inc. Michigan and Minnesota: Beet sugar production occurs in these states. Examples include Michigan Sugar Company and American Crystal Sugar Company.   Many states have confectionery manufacturers. Examples include Mars (Illinois) and Hershey (Pennsylvania). Edible fruits, nuts, peel of citrus fruit, melons: California: A major producer of a wide variety of fruits, nuts (almonds, walnuts, pistachios), and melons. Examples include Wonderful Company (almonds, pistachios, citrus) and various fruit cooperatives.   Florida: Known for citrus fruits (oranges, grapefruit). Example: Tropicana (though processing, relies on Florida-grown fruit).   Washington: Leading producer of apples, pears, and cherries. Numerous fruit growers and packing companies.   Georgia: Famous for peaches and pecans.   Animal, vegetable fats and oils, cleavage products: Iowa and Illinois: Major producers of soybean oil and corn oil due to significant soybean and corn farming. Companies like Cargill and Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) have processing plants in these states.   California: Produces olive oil and other specialty oils. Numerous smaller producers.   Manufacturers of plaiting material, basketwork: This is a niche category, and manufacturing is likely smaller-scale and more dispersed. Some craft industries exist in states like North Carolina (traditional crafts), Maine (basket weaving), and regions with Native American populations with traditional weaving practices. Identifying large companies is difficult in this specific niche.   Electrical, electronic equipment: California: A major hub for electronics design and some manufacturing, particularly in Silicon Valley. Examples include Apple, Tesla (automotive electronics), and numerous semiconductor companies.   Texas: Growing in electronics manufacturing. Examples include Dell and Texas Instruments. Massachusetts: Strong in electronics and high-tech manufacturing. Example: General Electric (various electrical equipment). Edible vegetables and certain roots and tubers: California: Leads in the production of a vast array of vegetables. Numerous large agricultural companies.   Idaho: Famous for potatoes. Example: Lamb Weston. Washington and Oregon: Produce various vegetables and root crops.   Other made textile articles, sets, worn clothing: Textile manufacturing has largely shifted overseas, but some specialized textile production and recycling of worn clothing occur in the US. North Carolina and South Carolina: Historically strong in textiles, some manufacturing of specialized items and textile waste processing remains.   California and New York: Centers for the fashion industry, with some small-scale garment manufacturing and design.   It's important to note that while these states and companies can manufacture similar types of goods, the specific varieties, qualities, and scales of production might differ significantly from those imported from Malawi. Malawi's exports often focus on raw or minimally processed agricultural goods and some basic manufactured items. The US, with its more advanced industrial base, typically focuses on higher-value-added manufactured products and large-scale agricultural production.

Investing in USA

theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters

Sources : ForbesUSDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia International Trade Administration

theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

theboardiQ Logo

Economic
Relevance
Ranking

Get Great Talent. Subscribe.

Thanks for subscribing!

265 Garnet Dr 

Livermore, CA 94550

  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
bottom of page