top of page

Kyrgyzstan

US Revised Tariffs (%)

10

Ease of doing business

theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:

Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.

 

Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

david-whipple-mU-wz7JlJMc-unsplash_Ravid.jpg
Revised Tariff %
Original Tariff %
Country Tariff Rate %
Share of US Imports % (1 implies <1%)
10
10
3
1
Exports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Imports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Balance (in USD Bill.) 2024
0.13
0.02
0.12

Implications

Here is an update on the US tariffs landscape, focusing on deals, the status of Kyrgyzstan, and the impact on major US companies:


US Tariffs Update: Deals, Kyrgyzstan, and Company Impact (October 2025)



1. Deals and Agreements Status (October 2025)


The U.S. has pursued a strategy of bilateral deals to modify its "reciprocal tariff" regime, which began with a universal baseline rate of 10% in April 2025.


Partner(s)

Agreement Status

Key Tariff Detail

China

Truce Collapsed

10% currently, but a 100% additional tariff is threatened for November 1, 2025. The original increase to 34% is delayed until Nov. 10.

European Union (EU)

Finalized Agreement

A 15% U.S. tariff on most EU goods is in effect. The EU eliminated tariffs on certain U.S. industrial goods.

Japan, United Kingdom, South Korea, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia

Preliminary Agreements

These countries have reached preliminary agreements with the U.S. that resulted in their tariff rates being reduced below the original proposed high rates.

Canada

No Agreement

Tariffs on Canadian goods have seen an increase, currently at roughly 35% for non-USMCA-compliant goods, in addition to steel/aluminum duties.



2. Kyrgyzstan's Status


Area

Status (October 2025)

Key Details

US Tariff Rate

10% (Baseline)

Kyrgyzstan is currently subject to the 10% baseline U.S. reciprocal tariff, a rate considered relatively low in the current global environment.

Trade Agreements

Bilateral & Regional

The U.S. and Kyrgyzstan have a Bilateral Investment Treaty and are parties to a Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) with other Central Asian countries.

EU Relationship

Strengthened

In June 2024, the EU and the Kyrgyz Republic signed an Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (EPCA) to deepen cooperation, including in trade and investment.



3. Impact on Major US Companies


The latest tariff threat against China—a massive 100% additional tariff—has caused significant market volatility, specifically hitting companies with heavy reliance on Chinese sourcing or those whose products are critical to U.S.-China technology disputes.

Industry

Company Examples

Impact Details

Technology/Tech Megacaps

Nvidia, Amazon, Tesla, Microsoft

Market capitalizations of major tech stocks (including Nvidia, Amazon, and Tesla) saw a collective wipeout of over $770 billion following the latest China tariff threats.

Automotive

Tesla, Toyota, Hyundai

The sector faces steep tariffs on imported vehicles and parts. Toyota and Hyundai reported hundreds of millions in profit loss due to the duties, and Tesla is a major importer of China-made vehicles and components.

Manufacturing/Heavy Equipment

Caterpillar

Has reported hundreds of millions in increased manufacturing costs and plunging operating profits directly tied to higher steel, aluminum, and other import duties.

Apparel & Footwear

Nike, Adidas, Levi Strauss

Companies are absorbing hundreds of millions in projected extra costs from tariffs, prompting them to implement price hikes and accelerate the shifting of their supply chains away from China.

Consumer Goods

Apple, Walmart, P&G

Companies that import finished goods or components for assembly face a significant financial burden, which is increasingly being passed on to American consumers through higher prices. Apple specifically cited tariffs as a material drag on profits.


US Revised Tariffs

Country Tariffs

Balance of Trade

Commercial Guide

Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals

Tariff Rate for US

World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.

US Imports Guide 

United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.

Investing in USA

theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters

Sources : ForbesUSDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia International Trade Administration

theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

theboardiQ Logo

Economic
Relevance
Ranking

Get Great Talent. Subscribe.

Thanks for subscribing!

265 Garnet Dr 

Livermore, CA 94550

  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
bottom of page