
Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

Implications
The United States and Japan have reached a significant trade deal, announced on July 22, 2025, which aims to reshape their economic relationship and provide some relief from previously threatened higher tariffs. This agreement comes just days before the August 1 deadline for new reciprocal tariffs to take effect.
Status of the Deal:
Agreement Reached: President Donald Trump announced the terms of a trade deal with Japan, which was confirmed by Japan's chief cabinet secretary, Yoshimasa Hayashi.
Tariff Reduction: Under the agreement, imports from Japan will face a 15% tariff in the United States. This is a significant reduction from the 25% tariff that Trump had threatened to impose starting August 1 if a deal was not reached. This 15% rate also applies to Japanese cars and auto parts, down from a 25% rate currently in place for such imports.
Japanese Investment: Japan has committed to a massive $550 billion investment into the United States, which the US expects to yield 90% of the profits and create hundreds of thousands of jobs. The specific details and structure of this investment are not yet fully clear.
Market Access for US Goods: Japan will open its markets to US-made cars, trucks, rice, and other agricultural products, addressing long-standing US complaints about market access in these sectors.
Steel and Aluminum Exclusions: Notably, the deal does not include adjustments to US levies on steel and aluminum, which remain at 50%. This means Japanese steel and aluminum exports to the US will continue to face these higher tariffs.
Formal Documentation Pending: As of now, official documentation outlining the full details of the agreement has not been publicly released by either side.
Overall Impact:
Immediate Relief and Uncertainty Reduction: The deal provides significant relief to Japanese exporters, particularly in the automotive sector, by averting the much higher 25% tariffs that were looming. This has eased some of the immediate trade uncertainty between the two countries.
Boost to US Economy (Expected): The promised $550 billion investment by Japan is expected to create a substantial number of jobs and boost various sectors within the US, including potentially semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, and energy (such as an Alaskan natural gas venture).
Shift in Trade Dynamics: The agreement reflects the current US administration's strategy of using tariffs as leverage to secure bilateral deals that open foreign markets to American goods and encourage investment in the US.
Inflationary Concerns: While the lower tariff rate is a positive, some economists caution that any tariff, even at 15%, is higher than what was in place before April 2025 (often low single digits). This could still lead to some increased costs for US consumers and businesses, though less severe than the threatened 25%.
Global Precedent: The deal, alongside recent agreements with Indonesia and the Philippines, sets a precedent for other countries that are currently negotiating with the US to avoid higher tariffs by making similar concessions, including market access and investments.
Impact on Companies:
Japanese Automakers (e.g., Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Mazda, Subaru): This is perhaps the biggest "win" for Japanese companies. The reduction of auto tariffs to 15% from a potential 25% or existing 27.5% is a major positive. Shares of these companies rallied significantly after the announcement.
Reduced Costs: Lower tariffs mean reduced import costs for Japanese-made vehicles and parts entering the US, which can alleviate pricing pressures for US dealerships and consumers.
Improved Profitability: Companies with a smaller US production presence (like Nissan and Honda) are particularly sensitive to these tariffs, and the reduction is expected to improve their profit forecasts.
Supply Consistency: Reduced tariff uncertainty can lead to improved supply chain consistency and inventory flexibility for dealers.
US Investment: Japanese automakers may also contribute to the promised $550 billion investment, potentially leading to further expansion or establishment of manufacturing facilities in the US, creating jobs.US Automotive Industry: US car buyers could see slightly lower price increases on Japanese imports than initially feared. US automakers that rely on Japanese parts might also benefit from stable import costs.
US Agricultural Sector: Farmers producing rice and other agricultural products are set to gain from increased market access to Japan.
US Energy Sector: The deal includes a hint at an LNG joint venture with Japan focused on Alaska, signaling potential new opportunities for US energy companies.
US Tech Companies (e.g., Oracle, Cisco): While not explicitly part of the Japan deal, the broader trend of trade agreements (like with Bahrain) encouraging partners to shift away from Chinese tech towards US alternatives could indirectly benefit US tech firms.
Japanese Steel and Aluminum Producers: These companies will continue to face the higher 50% tariffs, as this aspect of trade was not included in the new agreement. This means they will still face significant cost disadvantages in the US market compared to domestic producers or those from countries with lower or no steel/aluminum tariffs.
Other Japanese Exporters: All other Japanese goods will now face a 15% tariff, which is higher than the very low single-digit rates they generally faced before April 2025, but better than the previously threatened 25%. Companies will need to adjust their pricing and supply chain strategies accordingly.
In summary, the US-Japan trade deal is a significant development that averts a major tariff escalation for Japan, particularly its critical automotive sector, in exchange for substantial Japanese investment in the US and increased market access for American goods. While it brings some relief and new opportunities, the long-term economic ramifications will depend on the full implementation details and the broader global trade environment.
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |