
Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

Implications
As of late January 2026, the US-Iran trade landscape has undergone a seismic shift due to a new "secondary tariff" policy. This strategy targets not just Iran, but any nation maintaining trade ties with Tehran.
Latest US Tariffs Update (January 2026)
On January 12, 2026, President Trump announced a sweeping 25% tariff on goods from any country that continues to conduct business with Iran.
Trigger: The measures were framed as a response to Iran’s internal crackdown on anti-government protests that began in late December 2025.
Mechanism: Unlike traditional direct tariffs, these are "secondary tariffs" designed to force a choice: trade with Iran or trade with the US.
Legal Status: While announced with "immediate effect," formal Executive Orders are still being finalized, and the administration's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) for such tariffs is currently facing a US Supreme Court challenge.
Major Companies Impacted
The impact is felt most heavily in the Automotive, Energy, and Electronics sectors, as global supply chains are forced to decouple from Iranian inputs or risk the 25% US penalty.
Automotive Giants (VW, BMW, Stellantis, Ford, GM): These companies face massive uncertainty. For example, BMW and Ford are reassessing battery plant investments because their suppliers (often in China or Turkey) have ties to Iranian raw materials or energy.
Chinese EV Manufacturers (BYD, Geely): Targeted heavily as the US seeks to block "backdoor" trade where Chinese firms use Iranian energy to lower production costs.
Indian Refiners (Reliance Industries, Indian Oil): India was already hit with a 25% tariff for Russian oil; a second 25% "Iran tariff" would effectively make Indian exports to the US uncompetitive.
Logistics & Retailers: Global shipping firms (like those managing the "shadow fleet") and major retailers are bracing for increased "country of origin" documentation costs to prove no Iranian involvement.
GDP & Economic Impact
Global Growth: The IMF warns that this "spiral of escalation" could drag global growth down from its projected 3.3% in 2026 if tit-for-tat trade wars continue.
US GDP: While the US economy remains resilient (projected 2.4% growth in 2026), the tariffs are expected to cause "supply chain friction" inflation.
Iran Economy: The World Bank projects Iran's economy will shrink in 2026, with inflation potentially reaching 60% as its currency (the Rial) continues to devalue.
Latest Country Balance of Trade (BOT) YTD
Note: As of Jan 27, 2026, "YTD" (Year-to-Date) figures are preliminary. The following are the most recent annualized projections.
Indicator | Value (Projection) | Context |
Iran Total Exports | ~$112.6B (Dec 2025) | Primarily oil/gas (82%) to China/India. |
Iran Total Imports | ~$72.4B (Mar 2025) | Non-electrical machinery and chemicals. |
Iran BOT (YTD Proj.) | -$3,000M | Projected shift to a deficit as sanctions bite harder in 2026. |
US-Iran Trade | Negligible | Direct trade is virtually non-existent due to primary sanctions. |
SWOT Analysis: US-Iran Trade Relations (2026)
Strengths | Weaknesses |
US: Massive leverage as the world’s largest consumer market. | US: Legal uncertainty regarding the President's tariff authority (Supreme Court). |
Iran: Strategic control over the Strait of Hormuz and massive energy reserves. | Iran: Extreme currency volatility and internal social unrest. |
Opportunities | Threats |
US: Potential to reshore manufacturing by penalizing "bad actors." | Global: Supply chain "decoupling" leads to higher costs for US consumers. |
Iran: Deepening ties with Russia/China as part of a "sanction-proof" bloc. | Security: Escalation into direct military conflict following trade strikes. |
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |