Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.
Implications
As of January 20, 2026, the trade relationship between the United States and the Falkland Islands is defined by the broader "America First" reciprocal tariff framework. After a period of extreme volatility in early 2025, the tariff landscape for the Islands has stabilized at a lower, albeit significant, baseline.
Below is the update on tariffs, trade deals, and economic impacts for the Falkland Islands.
US–Falkland Islands Trade Update (2026)
Category | Status / Impact Details |
Current Tariff Rate | 10% Reciprocal Tariff. This is the baseline rate as of January 2026. It was reduced from a peak of 41–42% (April 2025) following a successful rate reduction appeal. |
Trade Deals | No bilateral "Free Trade Agreement" (FTA) exists. The 10% rate is a "Reciprocal Deal" framework aimed at maintaining market access for fish exports while avoiding the high-tier 40%+ duties. |
Trade Impact | Total exports to the US are approximately $27.4M. The 10% tariff acts as a fixed cost on the Toothfish and Mollusc sectors, which comprise nearly 95% of trade with the US. |
GDP Impact | Moderate to High Sensitivity. Because the Falkland Islands' economy is small (GDP ~$300M), a $27M export line represents nearly 10% of total GDP. Even a 10% tariff creates a multi-million dollar drag on the local economy. |
Companies Impact | Primarily impacts the Falkland Islands Fishing Companies (e.g., Consolidated Fisheries Ltd, Argos, Polar Seafish). These firms face narrower margins when competing in the US premium seafood market. |
Key Developments & Context
The 2025 "Tariff Storm": In April 2025, the US initially hit the Falkland Islands with a 42% tax under the Reciprocal Trade and Tariffs Memorandum. This threatened to entirely decouple the Islands' fishing industry from the US market. However, by mid-2025, the rate was slashed to 10% after negotiations emphasized the unique nature of the Islands' exports (non-competitive with US domestic catch).
Greenland Dispute Spillover: In January 2026, a new dispute over Greenland has led to threatened 10%–25% tariffs on several NATO allies, including the UK. As a British Overseas Territory, the Falklands are monitoring whether these "Greenland Tariffs" will stack on top of their existing 10% rate.
Sector Focus:
Toothfish (Sea Bass): The US remains the primary destination for "Patagonian Toothfish." The 10% tariff is currently passed on to US high-end restaurants and consumers, but further increases would likely force exporters to shift volume toward Spain or the Far East.
Wool: Though a smaller export to the US ($6.3M total global), the tariff makes the US market less attractive compared to traditional buyers in the UK and Italy.
Economic Risks for 2026
Supreme Court Ruling: The US Supreme Court is currently reviewing the President’s authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose these tariffs. A ruling against the administration could lead to tariff refunds for Falkland exporters.
Retaliation Risk: While the Falkland Islands Government (FIG) does not have the scale to retaliate, any trade friction between the UK and US (related to the 2026 Greenland dispute) could inadvertently lead to higher costs for US-made equipment (telephones, chemical instruments) imported by the Islands.
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.
Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |