Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.
Implications
As of early 2026, the trade relationship between the US and Eswatini has shifted significantly following the implementation of new reciprocal tariffs and the expiration of key trade preferences. While Eswatini remains a member of the Southern African Customs Union (SACU), it is grappling with the transition from duty-free access to a baseline tariff regime.
US-Eswatini Trade & Tariff Update (2025–2026)
Category | Status & Impact Details |
Tariff Rates | A baseline 10% reciprocal tariff was imposed on most Eswatini exports to the US starting in April 2025. While initially paused for 90 days, the rate became fully effective in August 2025. |
Trade Deals | AGOA (African Growth and Opportunity Act) expired in September 2025. While Eswatini was eligible in 2025, the program's lapse has removed duty-free access for apparel and sugar. The TIDCA (2008) remains the primary consultative framework. |
Trade Impact | Direct trade is relatively small (~1.4% of Eswatini's total exports), but the loss of preferential margins has hit competitiveness in textiles and fruit juices, which were major US-bound products. |
GDP Impact | Minimal aggregate impact (est. <0.5% GDP change) due to low direct US trade volume. However, the indirect impact via South Africa (facing 30% tariffs) is severe, as Eswatini depends on SACU revenue and the SA market. |
Company Impact | Major exporters like Eswatini Sugar Association, Coca-Cola Beverages Eswatini, and textile firms (e.g., Zheng Yong) are facing higher costs or seeking alternative markets like the EU and AfCFTA. |
Key Insights
The "South Africa" Proxy: Eswatini's economy is pegged to the South African Rand and heavily reliant on SACU revenue shares. Because South Africa was hit with a much higher 30% tariff, Eswatini is seeing a "domino effect" through reduced SACU payouts and increased inflation from its neighbor.
Sector Vulnerabilities: * Sugar & Fruit: Historically the largest exports to the US. These now face the 10% baseline unless specific "non-reciprocal" negotiations succeed.
Textiles: The sector is high-risk for job losses as the 10% tariff erodes the thin margins that made Eswatini an attractive AGOA alternative to Asian manufacturers.
Strategic Pivot: The Eswatini Ministry of Commerce is currently prioritizing the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) and the SADC-EU Economic Partnership Agreement to offset the decline in US market viability.
Company-Specific Outlook
Coca-Cola Beverages Eswatini: A major regional hub; while much of its product stays in Africa, any global supply chain shifts due to US policy impact its local investment scale.
Textile Manufacturers: Many firms in the Matsapha industrial area were established specifically for AGOA access. Without a 2026 renewal of the act, these companies are at risk of relocating to countries with better EU trade terms.
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.
Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |