
Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

Implications
The United States' trade relationship with Colombia is currently in a state of flux due to new tariff policies implemented by the Trump administration, despite an existing Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the two countries.
Tariffs Update:
10% Baseline Tariff: Effective April 5, 2025, a 10% tariff was imposed on products exported from Colombia to the US. This is part of a broader "reciprocal" tariff policy enacted by the US to address trade deficits.
Previous Threats & Rescissions: Earlier in 2025, there was a threat of a 25% tariff on all Colombian goods, which could have escalated to 50%, particularly in retaliation for Colombia's initial refusal to accept deported Colombian citizens from the US. However, Colombia ultimately accepted the deportees, and these higher tariffs were rescinded.
August 1, 2025 Deadline: While the 10% baseline tariff is in effect, the Trump administration has extended a pause on higher, country-specific reciprocal tariffs until August 1, 2025. Bilateral negotiations are ongoing, and the final rates for some countries will be determined by then. It's unclear if Colombia will face a higher rate than the 10% baseline after this deadline, but countries that do not reach agreements may face increased tariffs.
Potential for Retaliation: The US has stated that if any trading partner retaliates against the US with import duties on US exports, the scope of the tariffs imposed by the US may be increased or expanded.
Status of Deals and Agreements:
US-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement (TPA): The long-standing FTA (in force since 2012) aims to eliminate tariffs and other trade barriers. However, the current US tariff policies are being applied in addition to any existing duties under the TPA. It is "likely that exports from Colombia to the US, covered by the Free Trade Agreement between the two countries, will not be exempt from the 10% tariff."
Renegotiation Efforts: The Colombian government, under President Gustavo Petro, has expressed a strong desire to renegotiate the TPA, arguing that it has led to unfair competition for Colombian products, especially agricultural ones, and has hindered the growth of the Colombian economy. The Free Trade Commission (FTC) of the TPA has been actively involved, with the US and Colombia issuing a reinterpretation of investment protection standards in January 2025. While there's a push for renegotiation from Colombia, opening the TPA to full renegotiation is unlikely to move forward in the US Congress. Instead, adjustments are more likely to occur through the FTC.
Impact on Companies:
Colombian Exporters: The 10% tariff is already impacting Colombian exports to the US. A study by the Colombian American Chamber of Commerce (AmCham Colombia) indicates that about 18% of Colombia's exports to the U.S. are significantly affected, potentially leading to an 8% drop in overall exports. However, some Colombian products, like electrical materials, textiles and apparel, and sugar and confectionary, may see opportunities due to higher tariffs on competitors like China. Flowers, coffee, aluminum, plastics, and processed fruit and vegetable products are also notable Colombian exports.
US Exporters: Colombia remains a crucial market for US agricultural producers, with over $1 billion in annual sales of yellow and white corn. Exports of soybeans, wheat, rice, cotton, and various fruits and processed livestock products could be severely impacted if trade relations worsen. US companies that rely on imports from Colombia for inputs, particularly in protein production (eggs, chicken, pork, fish), could face higher costs due to increased prices of imported goods.
Affected Sectors: Companies in sectors like oil, cut flowers, and coffee (Colombian exports) and corn, soybeans, and other agricultural products (US exports to Colombia) are particularly susceptible to these new tariffs and any further trade escalations.
Broader Economic Impact: The tariffs could contribute to higher inflation in Colombia and negatively affect its economic growth. For US companies, the uncertainty surrounding trade rules due to the ongoing negotiations and potential for further tariff increases can delay investment, contracts, and hiring decisions.
The situation remains dynamic, with ongoing negotiations and the possibility of further adjustments to tariff rates as the August 1 deadline approaches.
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |