top of page

China

US Revised Tariffs (%)

30

Ease of doing business

theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:

Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.

 

Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

david-whipple-mU-wz7JlJMc-unsplash_Ravid.jpg
Share of US Imports % (1 implies <1%)
US Tariff %
Revised Tariff %
Country Tariff Rate %
13.4
145
30
10
Exports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Imports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Balance (in USD Bill.) 2024
143.55
438.95
-295.4

Implications

The landscape of US tariffs on China is complex and constantly evolving, with a mix of agreements, new impositions, and ongoing negotiations. Here's a summary of the latest updates:


Current Tariff Status and Deals:


  • Average US Tariff Rate: The average US tariff on Chinese goods currently stands at 51.1%, while China's duties on US exports average 32.6%.

  • June 2025 Trade Deal: In June 2025, the US and China reached a new trade deal aimed at de-escalating tensions.
    US Tariffs on China: The US agreed to reduce its tariffs on Chinese imports to a flat rate of 55%, down from a previous high of 145%. This 55% includes a 10% base tariff (currently under legal challenge), a 25% tariff from Trump's first term, and an additional 20% related to alleged fentanyl trafficking.
    China Tariffs on US: In exchange, China agreed to lower its tariffs on American goods to 10%, a significant cut from its previous 125%.
    Strategic Minerals: A key aspect of this deal is China's commitment to expedite rare-earth export permits, which are crucial for US tech and defense industries. In return, the US will rescind some technology and visa restrictions.
    Chinese Students: The deal also includes a concession allowing Chinese students to continue attending US universities.
    Limited Scope: While this agreement has eased some immediate tensions, analysts note that it primarily rolls back recent escalations rather than addressing long-standing trade imbalances or non-market behavior. Deeper disagreements between the two sides remain.

  • August 1, 2025 Deadline: While many countries have been granted a delay for new reciprocal tariffs until August 1, 2025, China was not given this delay. Instead, China has until August 12, 2025, to reach a further agreement with the US, or it faces the possibility of additional import restrictions. This suggests that despite the June deal, the US is still applying pressure.


Key Issues and Factors:


  • Strategic Minerals: Minerals like rare earths, cobalt, and lithium are at the heart of the trade dynamic. The US relies heavily on China for rare earth imports (around 70%), giving Beijing significant leverage. China has previously weaponized this dominance by placing strategic minerals under export control, which reportedly influenced the US to agree to temporary tariff rollbacks.

  • Fentanyl Crisis: A portion of the US tariffs on China (20%) is specifically tied to alleged fentanyl trafficking, indicating a broader approach to trade policy that incorporates national security and public health concerns.

  • "Anti-American BRICS Policies": The U.S. has generally warned that any country aligning with "Anti-American BRICS policies" may face an additional 10% tariff, though it's not clear if this directly applies to China given its current tariff structure.


Affected Companies and Sectors:


  • US Tech & Defense Industries: These sectors stand to benefit from eased rare-earth access, which is crucial for their supply chains.

  • Chinese Rare-Earth Miners/Exporters: These companies could see a partial market recovery due to the agreement on rare earth exports.

  • US Services (Travel, Education): Increased Chinese engagement in these areas is anticipated as some tech tensions cool.

  • Global Automakers: In the past, Chinese export controls on rare earth magnets forced global automakers to pause production, highlighting the interconnectedness of supply chains.

  • Household Appliances: As of June 23, 2025, several household appliances containing steel are subject to an additional 50% tariff when imported into the US, levied on the steel content. This impacts companies involved in these product lines.


The situation remains fluid, and analysts anticipate further negotiations and potentially industry-specific exemptions in the coming months, even with the August 12 deadline approaching for China. The broader goal for the US appears to be addressing its trade deficit and what it perceives as unfair trade practices, while China continues to protect its strategic interests.

US Revised Tariffs

Country Tariffs

Balance of Trade

Commercial Guide

Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals

Tariff Rate for US

World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.

US Imports Guide 

United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.

Investing in USA

theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters

Sources : ForbesUSDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia International Trade Administration

theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

theboardiQ Logo

Economic
Relevance
Ranking

Get Great Talent. Subscribe.

Thanks for subscribing!

265 Garnet Dr 

Livermore, CA 94550

  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
bottom of page