top of page

China

US Revised Tariffs (%)

47

Ease of doing business

theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:

Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.

 

Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

david-whipple-mU-wz7JlJMc-unsplash_Ravid.jpg
Revised Tariff %
Original Tariff %
Country Tariff Rate %
Share of US Imports % (1 implies <1%)
47
145
10
13.4
Exports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Imports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Balance (in USD Bill.) 2024
143.55
438.95
-295.4

Implications

The U.S. tariff situation with China has been the most volatile and severe globally in 2025.1 Following a period of aggressive tariff escalation by the U.S. and retaliatory restrictions by China, the two sides recently reached a fragile, temporary truce.2


This analysis is based on the situation as of the end of October 2025, following the latest high-level meeting.


🇨🇳 US Tariffs Update for China: Fragile Truce and Shifting Rates


The U.S. tariff regime on China is complex, involving multiple legal authorities (Section 301, IEEPA) layered on top of each other. The average tariff on Chinese goods peaked in 2025 but has recently been lowered as part of a temporary deal.3



1. Deals and Agreements: The Tactical Truce


Key Agreement/Action

Status and Terms (Effective Oct/Nov 2025)

Reciprocal Chinese Action

Overall Tariff Reduction

Average U.S. Tariff Cut from 57% to 47% on Chinese goods. This includes the following two primary components:

China agreed to reduce its retaliatory tariffs on certain U.S. goods.

Fentanyl-Linked Tariff

Reduced from 20% to 10%. (This was an IEEPA tariff).

China committed to expanding cooperation to curb the flow of fentanyl precursor chemicals.

Rare Earth Minerals

U.S. averts the threatened imposition of an additional 100% tariff on Chinese goods.

China agrees to pause (defer) for one year its recently announced restrictions on the export of rare earth minerals.

Agricultural Purchases

U.S. receives a commitment for immediate, large-scale Chinese purchases of American soybeans and other farm products.

U.S. relief for its farm sector.

Suspension of Investigation

U.S. suspends for one year a Section 301 investigation into China's shipbuilding industry.

China freezes its countermeasures on American ships for the same duration.

Key Takeaway: The current agreement is less a comprehensive trade deal and more a truce to pull back from the brink of a near-total trade embargo, primarily by reducing the average U.S. tariff to 47% and delaying China's most powerful economic weapon (rare earth restrictions).

2. Companies and Sectors Impact


China continues to face the highest cumulative U.S. tariff rate of any major trading partner.4 The impact is felt across supply chains globally.


Sector

Impact of High Tariffs (Average 47%)

Key Companies/Products Affected

Electronics & Consumer Goods

Companies face high import costs, forcing a choice between absorbing the tariff (reducing profit margins) or passing the cost to U.S. consumers (leading to higher prices). Importers have engaged in "front-loading" (accelerating shipments) to beat future tariff deadlines.

U.S. Importers/Retailers (e.g., Walmart, Target, Apple suppliers); Chinese Exporters of electronics, machinery, and apparel.

Critical Minerals & Rare Earths

The recent restrictions by Beijing threatened to cripple U.S. supply chains for advanced manufacturing (EVs, defense, semiconductors). The one-year pause provides a crucial, temporary reprieve for U.S. firms.

U.S. Manufacturers (e.g., Tesla, defense contractors, semiconductor firms) heavily reliant on Chinese-processed rare earths.

Agriculture

The U.S. farm sector was hit hardest by China's retaliatory tariffs, which stopped massive purchases of soybeans. The commitment to immediately resume large-scale purchases is a significant boost to U.S. farmers.

U.S. Soybean, Corn, and Hog Producers (especially in the Midwest).

High-Tech & Semiconductors

U.S. export controls and targeted IEEPA tariffs have specifically impacted China's ability to develop its AI and defense sectors. Tariffs on wafers, polysilicon, and advanced computing hardware remain high.

Nvidia, AMD, ASML (U.S./Dutch tech suppliers facing export restrictions); Huawei, SMIC (Chinese tech firms).


3. GDP and Economic Impact


The U.S.-China conflict remains the most significant headwind for the global economy, though both sides have shown a surprising degree of resilience.

Economic Metric

Impact on U.S.

Impact on China

Overall GDP

U.S. economy faces an overall projected long-term GDP loss of -0.4% to -0.6% from the combined 2025 tariffs (including those on China). Goods inflation is ticking up, contributing to a return of core inflation above 3%.

China's GDP growth has slowed, but less than initially feared. It has managed the blow by diverting exports to other markets, particularly Southeast Asia (ASEAN) and Africa, and by bolstering domestic investment in key technologies.

Trade Balance & Diversion

Trade deficit with China remains large. The tariffs have successfully pushed some supply chains out of China, but primarily into nearby Asian countries (Vietnam, Mexico) rather than back to the U.S.

China's trade surplus is likely to be larger than the previous year due to successful trade diversion and subsidized exports.

Global Trade

Initial forecasts suggested a 0.2% loss of global merchandise trade due to the U.S.-China conflict escalating earlier in 2025.

The one-year rare earth truce is critical, as a prolonged standoff would have had a catastrophic effect on global manufacturing relying on Chinese rare earth inputs.


US Revised Tariffs

Country Tariffs

Balance of Trade

Commercial Guide

Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals

Tariff Rate for US

World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.

US Imports Guide 

United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.

Investing in USA

theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters

Sources : ForbesUSDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia International Trade Administration

theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

theboardiQ Logo

Economic
Relevance
Ranking

Get Great Talent. Subscribe.

Thanks for subscribing!

265 Garnet Dr 

Livermore, CA 94550

  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
bottom of page