top of page

Brazil

US Revised Tariffs (%)

10

Ease of doing business

theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:

Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.

 

Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

david-whipple-mU-wz7JlJMc-unsplash_Ravid.jpg
Share of US Imports % (1 implies <1%)
US Tariff %
Revised Tariff %
Country Tariff Rate %
1.3
10
10
7.3
Exports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Imports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Balance (in USD Bill.) 2024
49.67
42.32
7.35

US Revised Tariffs

Country Tariffs

Balance of Trade

Commercial Guide

Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals

Tariff Rate for US

World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.

US Imports Guide 

United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.

Implications

As of Saturday, April 19, 2025, here's the latest update on tariffs involving Brazil: United States Tariffs on Goods from Brazil: Baseline Tariff: A 10% tariff is currently imposed on most goods imported from Brazil. This was part of the broader "reciprocal tariff" measures implemented by the United States, effective April 5, 2025. Steel: Brazilian steel exports to the U.S. continue to be subject to a 25% tariff. This tariff was in place prior to the recent broader tariff actions and has reportedly led to a decrease in Brazil's steel exports and production. Specific Products: Coffee: Brazilian raw coffee beans now face a 10% tariff in the U.S., where previously they were not subject to import tariffs. Orange Juice: U.S.-bound shipments of Brazilian orange juice are also subject to the new 10% tariff, in addition to existing tariffs which amounted to approximately $415.86 per tonne in the past year. This increase is expected to significantly raise the cost for Brazilian orange juice entering the U.S. market.   Beef: While the new across-the-board tariff is 10%, Brazilian beef already faces a 26.4% import tax when entering the U.S. for volumes exceeding a tariff-free quota of 65,000 tons (shared with other nations). It's unclear if the new 10% tariff is added on top of this existing rate. Ethanol: The U.S. imposes a 2.5% tariff on ethanol, while Brazil has an 18% tariff on U.S. ethanol exports.   Potential for Higher Tariffs: There have been discussions and warnings that the U.S. might impose tariffs on Brazilian imports that surpass the average rates Brazil applies to U.S. goods (around 5.8%). The U.S. has indicated that its tariff decisions could consider both direct tariffs and non-tariff barriers, where Brazil's restrictions are notably higher than in the U.S. Brazil's Response and Tariffs on Goods from the United States: Prioritizing Negotiation: Brazil has stated its intention to prioritize trade negotiations with the United States to address the imposed tariffs. While not ruling out retaliation, Brazil seems to favor diplomatic channels and dialogue.   Retaliatory Measures Possible: Brazil's congress has approved a measure allowing the government to adopt retaliatory trade measures without requiring congressional approval, ensuring a faster response if necessary. However, immediate retaliation seems unlikely as of now.   Tariffs on U.S. Goods: The weighted average tariff applied by Brazil to U.S. imports is approximately 5.8%. However, almost 50% of U.S. exports to Brazil enter tariff-free, and about 15% face tariffs no higher than 2%. Certain sectors like electronics face higher tariffs (e.g., around 60% on some manufactured retail goods imported by individuals). Key Considerations: The 10% tariff imposed by the U.S. is considered relatively low compared to tariffs levied on other major trading partners. Brazil's non-tariff barriers are a significant point of contention, with studies suggesting their impact could be equivalent to a 20-40% tariff in some sectors. The U.S. might factor these into future tariff decisions. The Brazilian government is analyzing the impact of the U.S. tariffs and exploring alternative trade agreements to mitigate potential negative effects. Sectors in Brazil with significant exports to the U.S., like orange juice and coffee, are particularly concerned about the impact of the new tariffs.   In summary, while Brazil faces a new 10% tariff on most of its exports to the United States, along with existing higher tariffs on steel and some agricultural products, its immediate focus is on negotiating with the U.S. government. The long-term impact will depend on the outcome of these discussions and any further actions taken by either country.

US Negotiation Strategy

Based on the most recent data from 2024, the top imports to the United States from Brazil by value are: Mineral fuels, oils, distillation products ($8.80 Billion) Iron and steel ($4.98 Billion) Machinery, nuclear reactors, boilers ($2.82 Billion) Commodities not specified according to kind ($2.77 Billion) Coffee, tea, mate and spices ($2.06 Billion) Here's a look at which states in the U.S. have manufacturing in similar sectors, along with some example companies: Mineral fuels, oils, distillation products: Texas: A major hub for oil and gas extraction and refining. Companies: ExxonMobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips.   Louisiana: Significant oil and gas industry and port infrastructure. Companies: Valero Energy, Marathon Petroleum.   California: Has oil refineries and is increasingly focused on renewable energy. Companies: Chevron, Phillips 66.   Iron and steel: Pennsylvania: Historically a major steel-producing state, still has significant capacity. Companies: U.S. Steel, Nucor. Indiana: Has a strong presence in steel production. Companies: Steel Dynamics, ArcelorMittal.   Ohio: Another key state for steel manufacturing. Companies: Cleveland-Cliffs, Nucor.   Machinery, nuclear reactors, boilers: This is a broad category encompassing diverse manufacturing.   Illinois: Known for industrial machinery production. Companies: Caterpillar, John Deere.   Wisconsin: Strong in manufacturing various types of machinery. Companies: Komatsu Mining Corp., Regal Rexnord. Ohio: Diverse manufacturing sector including machinery. Companies: General Electric, Siemens Energy. Commodities not specified according to kind: This is a very broad category and difficult to pinpoint specific manufacturing and states without more detailed subcategories. Coffee, tea, mate and spices: The U.S. does not have large-scale cultivation of coffee or tea due to climate limitations. However, there are companies involved in processing, roasting, and packaging these goods, often located near major ports or distribution centers. Spice production is more varied, with some cultivation and processing in states like California and Florida.   Companies (Processing/Packaging): JM Smucker Company (coffee), Starbucks (roasting and packaging), McCormick & Company (spices). It's important to note that while these states have manufacturing in similar sectors, the specific types, grades, and volumes of products may differ significantly from what is imported from Brazil. Additionally, some of Brazil's exports, like coffee and certain raw materials, may not have direct manufacturing equivalents in the U.S. due to natural resource availability or climate.

Investing in USA

theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters

Sources : ForbesUSDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia International Trade Administration

theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

theboardiQ Logo

Economic
Relevance
Ranking

Get Great Talent. Subscribe.

Thanks for subscribing!

265 Garnet Dr 

Livermore, CA 94550

  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
bottom of page