
Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

Implications
As of late January 2026, the trade relationship between the US and Bangladesh is at a critical juncture. While recent "reciprocal tariffs" have created headwinds, recent diplomatic efforts suggest a potential easing of these barriers.
1. Latest US Tariffs Update (January 2026)
Following the implementation of a 20% reciprocal tariff (down from an initial proposal of 35% in late 2025), the US administration is currently in active negotiations with Bangladesh's interim government.
Current Rate: 20% on most major exports (notably Ready-Made Garments - RMG).
Recent Development: On January 27, 2026, the Chief Adviser’s special envoy announced that Washington is "sincere" about lowering these tariffs further. An official announcement regarding a reduction is expected by early February 2026.
Strategic Moves: Bangladesh has attempted to mitigate tariff pressure by increasing imports of US Boeing jets, cotton, and soybean oil to reduce the trade deficit.
2. Major Companies & Sectors Impacted
The impact is heavily concentrated in the textile and apparel sector, which accounts for over 80% of Bangladesh's export earnings.
Company/Group | Impact Profile |
Ha-Meem Group | One of the largest exporters to the US (clients like Gap, Kohl's); faces margin pressure due to the 20% duty. |
Pacific Jeans | Significant denim supplier; vulnerable to shifts in US retail pricing and demand. |
Envoy Textiles | Impacted by fluctuations in raw material costs and reduced orders for high-value woven fabrics. |
Beximco & Square | Pharmaceutical and textile arms are navigating higher compliance costs and logistical hurdles. |
3. GDP & Balance of Trade (BOT) YTD 2026
The trade landscape for the current fiscal year (FY2025–26) shows a widening deficit despite growth in certain sectors.
GDP Impact: The Asian Development Bank (ADB) has revised Bangladesh's GDP growth forecast for FY26 downward (initially 5.1%) due to the slowdown in exports caused by US tariffs. Projections suggest a potential 14% drop in exports to the US if tariffs remain at 20%.
Country BOT (July–Nov 2025): * Total Trade Deficit: ~$10 billion (widened from $7.94 billion in the same period last year).
Import Payments: $27.59 billion (Up 6.1%).
Export Earnings: $18.18 billion (Up 0.6%).
US-Specific Trade Gap: Bangladesh currently maintains a trade surplus with the US of roughly $6 billion, though this is shrinking as Bangladesh ramps up US imports to appease trade negotiators.
4. SWOT Analysis: Bangladesh Export Sector (2026)
Strengths | Weaknesses |
- 2nd largest global RMG exporter. - Competitive labor costs (~$110/month). - Strong compliance standards post-Rana Plaza. | - Over-dependence on the RMG sector (80%+). - High reliance on imported raw materials. - Inefficient port logistics and infrastructure bottlenecks. |
Opportunities | Threats |
- "China Plus One" strategy: US firms shifting orders from China. - Potential Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the EU. - Graduation from LDC status (scheduled for late 2026). | - Reciprocal Tariffs: US policy remains volatile. - Regional Competition: India/Vietnam securing better US trade deals. - Post-LDC Graduation: Loss of duty-free access in many markets. |
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |