
Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

Implications
As of January 2026, the trade landscape for Aruba has been significantly influenced by the "America First" reciprocal trade policies and the global 10% baseline tariff implemented by the US in 2025. While Aruba remains a key regional partner, its high dependency on US imports has made it a conduit for "imported inflation."
1. Latest US Tariffs Update (2026)
Baseline Reciprocal Tariff: A 10% baseline tariff applies to most Aruban goods entering the US as of mid-2025. This measure has largely overshadowed the duty-free benefits previously enjoyed under the Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act (CBTPA).
Imported Inflationary Pressure: Because Aruba imports over 50% of its goods from the US, tariffs placed by the US on other nations (like China or Mexico) have increased the cost of components. These costs are passed down to Aruba, specifically affecting electronics, vehicles, and food products.
CBTPA Status: While still technically a beneficiary, the new US trade regime has added layers of administrative costs and reduced the "net" benefit of these regional agreements.
2. Major Companies Impacted
The impact is felt most acutely by companies reliant on cross-border hardware and the American consumer's disposable income.
Company / Sector | Nature of Impact |
Aruba Networks (HPE) | Reported price hikes of 8–12% on networking hardware due to global component tariffs affecting their supply chain. |
Marriott / Hilton / Hyatt | These major hotel groups face risks from a potential decline in US visitor volume; Americans represent ~75% of stayover visitors. |
Shipping Lines (Maersk/MSC) | Faced with logistical "front-loading" and increased port fees, impacting the cost of importing essential goods to the island. |
Local Retailers | Facing squeezed margins as the cost of US-sourced consumer goods (electronics/clothing) rises. |
3. GDP & Balance of Trade (BOT) Impact
The Aruban economy is seeing a "moderation" period following a high-growth 2024.
GDP Impact: Real GDP growth for 2026 is projected to slow to 1.8% (down from 3.9% in 2025). This is primarily driven by a 3.2% contraction in investment and cooling tourism exports as US inflation reduces the spending power of American travelers.
BOT YTD (2026): Aruba maintains a structural trade deficit.
Exports to US: Estimated at ~$4M–$5M (primarily precious metal scraps, hard liquor, and beauty products).
Imports from US: Estimated at ~$600M+ (primarily refined petroleum, machinery, and food).
Trend: The trade gap is widening slightly as the value of imports rises due to tariff-induced inflation, while export volume remains stagnant under the 10% US entry cost.
4. SWOT Analysis: Aruba Economy (2026)
Strengths | Weaknesses |
* High literacy (97.5%) and skilled labor force. * Robust tourism infrastructure. * High GDP per capita relative to regional peers (~$34k). | * Extreme dependency on US imports (>50%). * Vulnerability to US consumer sentiment. * Small domestic market with limited diversification. |
Opportunities | Threats |
* Expansion into Renewable Energy and Blue Economy. * Strengthening Regional Trade Agreements (CARICOM/LATAM). * Digital transformation and "Digital Nomad" residency. | * Imported Inflation: US tariffs on China/Mexico raising local costs. * Climate Change: Vulnerability to sea-level rise and hurricanes. * Contraction in real private investment. |
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |