
Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

Implications
The trade status between the US and Aruba has been impacted by the new, broad tariff policy implemented in 2025.
Here is an update on US Tariffs concerning Aruba as of October 2025:
Area | Status (October 2025) | Key Details |
Reciprocal US Tariffs on Aruba | 10% (Implemented) | Aruba is currently subject to the 10% baseline reciprocal tariff on most imported goods, which took effect in April 2025 on imports from all non-sanctioned countries. |
Higher Tariffs | Not Currently Applied | While a higher "reciprocal tariff" rate (which can range from 11% to over 40% for some countries) was implemented for many trading partners on August 7, 2025, Aruba does not appear to have been explicitly singled out for a punitive country-specific rate and remains at the 10% baseline. |
Deals and Agreements | Preferential Access Limited | Aruba is a beneficiary of the Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act (CBTPA), which historically provided duty-free access for many products. The new 10% baseline tariff is currently overriding this preferential status for eligible goods, increasing costs for Aruban exporters. |
WTO Status | WTO GPA Country | Aruba is listed as a World Trade Organization Government Procurement Agreement (WTO GPA) country, meaning its products qualify for specific trade consideration in US government procurement contracts. |
Companies Impacted
The primary impact on companies is two-fold: direct effects on Aruban exports and indirect effects from the global supply chain disruption.
Companies Impacted
The primary impact on companies is two-fold: direct effects on Aruban exports and indirect effects from the global supply chain disruption.
Category | Company/Sector Impacted | Details |
Aruban Exporters (Direct) | Companies exporting low-volume specialized goods. | While Aruba's exports to the US are small compared to its imports, companies dealing in products like beauty products, soaps, precious metal scrap, and other consumer goods now face the 10% tariff, raising their costs and making them less competitive against US domestic goods. |
US IT/Tech Companies (Indirect) | Aruba Networks (a subsidiary of Hewlett Packard Enterprise - HPE), Cisco, Dell, Microsoft, etc. | Hardware tariffs (largely related to China trade policy) have increased costs for finished electronics like servers and networking equipment. Aruba Networks wireless access points and controllers, which are part of a global supply chain, have seen prices rise by an estimated 8-12% due to these broader tariffs. |
Aruban Tourism Sector (Indirect) | Hotels, resorts, airlines, and local businesses. | The major concern for Aruba's heavily tourism-dependent economy is the indirect effect of the global trade war. Economists predict that the higher US tariffs leading to increased US consumer prices and a potential recession could result in a significant decline in U.S. tourist arrivals, which would severely impact the island's primary revenue source. |
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |