
Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

Implications
As of January 2026, Armenia’s trade landscape is navigating a complex shift in U.S. trade policy. While Armenia and the U.S. have strengthened ties through the "Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity" (TRIPP), the country faces significant collateral pressure from secondary U.S. tariffs aimed at regional partners.
1. Latest US Tariffs Update: Armenia
The primary development for early 2026 is the "Secondary Trade Pressure" strategy.
Iran-Related 25% Tariff: In mid-January 2026, the U.S. announced a 25% tariff on goods from any country doing business with Iran. Since Iran is one of Armenia's only two open land borders, this poses a severe threat to Armenian exports to the U.S.
Baseline 10% Tariff: This remains in effect from the sweeping April 2025 "global baseline" tariffs imposed on most U.S. trading partners, including Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia.
TRIPP Exemptions (Pending): There are ongoing negotiations to exempt goods moving through the "Trump Route" (TRIPP) from these hikes to incentivize the new transit corridor.
2. Major Companies & Sectors Impacted
U.S. investment in Armenia is concentrated in high-value sectors. The following entities and sectors are most sensitive to the current tariff environment:
Sector | Key Companies / Impacted Entities |
Mining & Energy | Lydian Armenia (Amulsar project) and ContourGlobal (Vorotan Cascade). Export costs for concentrates are rising. |
Technology | Synopsis, National Instruments, and Adobe. While service-based, hardware components for R&D centers face higher import/export costs. |
Logistics | TRIPP Development Co. (74% U.S. owned). This company manages the new transit route and is the "linchpin" for future trade. |
Jewelry & Gems | Local Armenian exporters of gold and diamonds (Armenia’s top export to the U.S.). This sector is hit hardest by the 10-25% duty range. |
3. GDP & Balance of Trade (BOT) Impact
GDP Growth: 2026 growth is projected at ~4.8% to 5.2%. The tariff environment is estimated to shave approximately 0.3% to 0.5% off potential growth due to increased costs for raw materials and dampened investor sentiment.
Balance of Trade (YTD Jan 2026):
Armenia historically runs a trade deficit.
Total BOT (Nov 2025): -$477.2 Million (Monthly).
YTD 2025 Total: ~$4.2 Billion deficit.
U.S.-Armenia Trade: The U.S. maintains a surplus. In 2025, Armenia exported roughly $54M to the U.S. while importing $105M. Higher tariffs are expected to further widen this gap as Armenian exports become less competitive in the U.S. market.
4. SWOT Analysis: Armenia 2026
Strengths | Weaknesses |
* Strong U.S. Strategic Partnership (TRIPP). | * Landlocked; limited to two open borders. |
* High-growth IT sector (6% of GDP). | * Heavy dependence on Russian energy/gas. |
* Prudent macroeconomic management. | * Small domestic market. |
Opportunities | Threats |
* Hub for "Trump Route" transit (Central Asia-Europe). | * 25% U.S. secondary tariffs due to Iran trade. |
* Closer integration with the EU market. | * Regional volatility (Azerbaijan/Russia/Iran). |
* Diversification into renewable energy. | * Global commodity price shocks (Gold/Copper). |
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |