Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.
Implications
The status of US tariffs and trade relations with Antigua and Barbuda is dominated by a long-standing World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute and the general impact of new US global tariff policies on the Caribbean region.
Here is an update:
Area | Status (October 2025) | Key Details |
WTO Gambling Dispute | Unresolved/Active Threat of Retaliation | Antigua and Barbuda has the right, granted by the WTO, to suspend an estimated $21 million annually in US intellectual property (IP) rights (e.g., copyright, patents) as compensation for the US shutting down its online gambling industry over two decades ago. |
IP Retaliation | Threat Amplified | Antigua continues to threaten to implement the WTO-authorized IP retaliation, but has not yet done so, hoping for a negotiated settlement. Government officials, however, have recently expressed diminished hope for a quick resolution. |
US Tariffs on Antiguan Goods | 10% Reciprocal Tariff (Implemented) | Goods imported from Antigua and Barbuda into the US are subject to the 10% baseline reciprocal tariff that was applied to almost all global trading partners in April 2025. |
Bilateral Trade Deals | None | Antigua and Barbuda does not have a Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) or a bilateral taxation treaty with the United States. |
Specific Impact on Companies Operating in Antigua and Barbuda
The primary impact on companies falls into two categories:
1. General US Tariff Impact on the Caribbean
Companies, including US firms, operating in Antigua and Barbuda face rising costs due to the 10% US reciprocal tariff and other general US trade policies:
Increased Export Costs: Antiguan goods exported to the US are now 10% more expensive due to the reciprocal tariff, challenging the competitiveness of local exporters.
Higher Import Costs/Inflation: The Caribbean largely relies on imports, many of which are sourced from or transit through the US. New US tariffs, including a major proposed port fee on Chinese-built vessels (which make up a significant portion of the region's shipping fleet), threaten to significantly increase the cost of essential imported goods (food, electronics, medicine), driving up inflation for both consumers and businesses.
Supply Chain Disruption: Companies, especially in the growing sectors of Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) and tourism, face rising operating expenses from the increased cost of imported inputs and logistics.
2. WTO Dispute and IP Risk (Gambling & Digital Sectors)
Targeted Risk for US IP Holders: If Antigua and Barbuda finally implements the WTO-authorized IP sanctions, companies that rely on US patents, trademarks, or copyrights—particularly in the digital/gambling, software, and entertainment sectors—would be directly impacted. This retaliation could theoretically allow Antiguan entities to ignore or use US intellectual property without penalty.
Investor Warning: The US State Department's latest Investment Climate Statement (2025) notes a separate, unresolved dispute concerning the alleged expropriation of an American-owned property and advises investors to exercise "careful consideration" when investing in Antiguan real estate.
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.
Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |