Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.
Implications
As of late January 2026, the trade relationship between the U.S. and Angola is navigating a period of significant transition. The lapse of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) in late 2025, combined with the U.S. administration's shift toward "Reciprocal Tariffs," has introduced new costs for Angolan exporters.
1. Latest U.S. Tariffs Update (January 2026)
The landscape for Angolan goods entering the U.S. has shifted from preferential duty-free access to a two-tiered tariff structure:
Universal Baseline: A 10% baseline tariff now applies to most imports that were previously duty-free under AGOA.
Reciprocal Tariffs: Effective August 7, 2025, the U.S. implemented a 15% reciprocal tariff on a range of Angolan products. This was a response to Angola's own import duties on U.S. goods (such as poultry and grains).
Secondary Threats: As of January 12, 2026, the U.S. has threatened additional 25% tariffs on any country (including Angola) maintaining significant trade ties with sanctioned entities in Iran.
2. Major Companies & Sectors Impacted
The impact is felt most in "non-commodity" sectors where margins are thin.
Endiama & Sodiam (Diamonds): While diamonds are a luxury export, the shift in marketing costs and potential tariffs on processed stones has forced these national giants to join the Natural Diamond Council (NDC) to secure Western market demand.
Sonangol (Oil & Gas): Relatively insulated. Crude petroleum (Angola’s top export to the U.S.) typically faces low Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rates. However, technical equipment imported from the U.S. for Sonangol's operations has become more expensive due to Angolan counter-tariffs.
Agribusiness (Smallholders): Emerging exporters of coffee, honey, and fish are the hardest hit. Without AGOA, these products now face the 10-15% "Reciprocal" and baseline hikes, making them less competitive against Latin American producers.
3. GDP & Balance of Trade (BOT) Impact
GDP Impact
Projected Growth: Real GDP growth for 2026 is projected to stay below 3.0%.
The "Tariff Drag": Economists estimate that the loss of AGOA and the implementation of new tariffs could shave approximately 0.2% to 0.4% off annual GDP growth by dampening the non-oil diversification efforts the government has prioritized.
Latest BOT (YTD Jan 2026)
Angola maintains a Trade Surplus with the U.S., though the volume is shrinking.
YTD Total Trade: ~$110M (Estimated for Jan 1–27, 2026).
Angola Exports to U.S.: Dominantly Crude Oil (~80%) and Diamonds.
U.S. Exports to Angola: Primarily Poultry Meat and specialized machinery.
Trend: U.S. imports from Angola dropped by nearly 70% year-on-year in late 2025 as the U.S. shifted some petroleum sourcing to domestic and North American (USMCA) providers to avoid global supply chain volatility.
4. SWOT Analysis: Angola Trade 2026
STRENGTHS | WEAKNESSES |
Mineral Wealth: 2nd largest oil producer in SSA; world-class diamond reserves. | Oil Over-reliance: 95% of exports are oil-based, leaving the BOT at the mercy of Brent prices. |
Reformed Debt: Public debt dropped from 100%+ (2020) to ~60% (2025). | Infrastructure Gaps: High logistics costs for non-oil exports. |
Strategic Location: Deepwater ports (Lobito Corridor) serving landlocked neighbors. | High Inflation: Consistently double-digit (~12–18%), eroding local purchasing power. |
OPPORTUNITIES | THREATS |
Lobito Corridor: U.S. and EU investment in rail infrastructure to export critical minerals. | AGOA Lapse: Continued lack of duty-free access stunts the growth of the textile/agro sectors. |
Renewable Energy: Massive untapped potential in hydroelectric and solar power. | Reciprocal Trade War: Escalating "tit-for-tat" tariffs with the U.S. could freeze new FDIs. |
Agriculture: 35 million hectares of arable land; potential for food self-sufficiency. | Global Slowdown: Reduced demand from China (Angola's largest debtor and trade partner). |
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.
Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |