Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.
Implications
As of late January 2026, trade relations between the U.S. and Algeria have entered a high-tension phase characterized by broad baseline tariffs and targeted industry-specific duties.
1. Latest US Tariffs Update (January 2026)
The U.S. has significantly shifted its trade posture toward Algeria under a "Reciprocal Tariff" framework.
Baseline "Reciprocal" Tariff: Effective April 9, 2025, the U.S. applied a 30% across-the-board tariff on all Algerian imports. This measure was justified under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), citing trade imbalances and non-reciprocal market access.
Steel Industry "Sledgehammer": On January 13, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published preliminary countervailing duty rates. Algeria was hit with a 72.94% duty on steel rebar—the highest among all countries investigated.
Combined Impact: For certain sectors like steel, the combined burden (30% baseline + 72.94% rebar duty + existing 25-50% Section 232 duties) can exceed 120%, effectively pricing Algerian steel out of the U.S. market.
Energy Exemptions: Strategic waivers remain in place for Crude Oil and Refined Petroleum to prevent U.S. energy price spikes, though refined derivatives often still face the 30% baseline.
2. Major Companies Impacted
Sonelgaz & GE: The long-standing joint venture for power generation equipment is under strain as the 30% tariff increases the cost of importing Algerian-manufactured components into the U.S.
ExxonMobil & Halliburton: While their extraction operations in Algeria are robust, their supply chains for moving refined products to the U.S. are navigating complex duty-drawback schemes to mitigate the 30% baseline.
Fertial & Somiphos (Phosphate/Fertilizers): These Algerian entities are seeing a shift in demand. While the U.S. is reviewing duties on Morocco/Russia, Algerian phosphate is increasingly being diverted to Asian markets (e.g., a recent 1mn t/yr MoU with Pupuk Indonesia signed Jan 26, 2026).
Pfizer: Impacted primarily through local manufacturing costs and the broader economic slowdown in Algeria affecting healthcare purchasing power.
3. Economic Indicators (2025–2026 YTD)
GDP Impact
The tariffs are estimated to shave 0.2% to 0.4% off Algeria's GDP growth in 2026. While the hydrocarbon sector provides a buffer, the tariffs directly undermine Algeria’s "Economic Diversification" strategy by crippling non-oil exports like steel, cement, and agriculture.
Latest Balance of Trade (BOT) - YTD 2026
Algeria traditionally maintains a trade surplus with the U.S. due to energy exports, but this surplus is narrowing.
2024 (Full Year): U.S. goods trade deficit with Algeria was $1.4 billion.
Late 2025/Early 2026 Trend: U.S. exports to Algeria (Soybeans, Corn, Aircraft) have surged by over 70% in specific months, while Algerian imports to the U.S. (excluding oil) have dropped by nearly 30% due to the 30% tariff wall.
4. SWOT Analysis: US-Algeria Trade Relations (2026)
STRENGTHS | WEAKNESSES |
Energy Reserves: 4th largest gas exporter globally; critical for U.S./EU energy security. | Hydrocarbon Reliance: Over 90% of export value is oil/gas, making GDP hyper-vulnerable to price swings. |
Geopolitical Position: Strategic "gateway" to Africa and Mediterranean security partner. | Bureaucracy: Heavy regulatory and "non-reciprocal" barriers that triggered the U.S. 30% tariff. |
OPPORTUNITIES | THREATS |
Green Hydrogen: High potential for renewable energy partnerships with U.S. tech firms. | Tariff Escalation: Combined duties exceeding 120% on manufactured goods like rebar. |
BRICS Accession: Potential to pivot trade toward the Global South and reduce U.S. dependency. | Legal Uncertainty: Ongoing U.S. Supreme Court challenges to the IEEPA tariffs could disrupt long-term planning. |
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.
Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |