
Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

Implications
As of January 2026, the trade landscape between the U.S. and Uganda has shifted significantly due to the expiration of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) and the implementation of new reciprocal tariff policies by the U.S. administration.
1. Latest US Tariffs Update (January 2026)
AGOA Expiration: AGOA officially expired on September 30, 2025. Since Uganda had already been removed from AGOA eligibility in early 2024 (due to human rights concerns regarding the Anti-Homosexuality Act), the broader expiration has solidified the loss of duty-free access for over 1,800 Ugandan products.
New Baseline Tariffs: In early January 2026, the U.S. administration imposed a 10% baseline tariff on imports from most global partners, including Uganda.
Specific Duties: Key Ugandan exports such as coffee, apparel, and certain agricultural chemicals now face standard Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) rates plus the new 10% surcharge, bringing effective tariffs on some agricultural goods to nearly 15-20%.
2. Major Companies Impacted
The impact is felt most acutely by firms involved in high-value exports and U.S.-sourced infrastructure:
Fine Spinners Uganda Ltd: A major apparel exporter that previously utilized AGOA; now faces high duties, forcing a shift in focus to the EU and regional EAC markets.
Uganda Airlines: Impacted by rising costs of U.S.-manufactured aircraft parts (Boeing) and fluctuating fuel prices tied to dollar strength.
Large-scale Coffee Exporters (e.g., Kyagalanyi Coffee): While coffee often has low base tariffs, the 10% surcharge reduces the "Uganda Origin" price competitiveness against Brazilian or Vietnamese beans.
Technology & Solar Firms: Companies importing U.S. tech for grid stabilization (e.g., those supported by USAID/Power Africa in the past) face higher equipment costs.
3. GDP Impact & Balance of Trade (BOT)
Despite trade tensions, Uganda’s GDP remains resilient due to the "First Oil" countdown.
GDP Growth (2026 Forecast): Projected at 6.4% to 7.0%. The impact of U.S. tariffs is estimated to shave roughly 0.5% off potential growth, but this is being offset by massive FDI into the Tilenga and Kingfisher oil projects.
Latest BOT YTD (January 2026):
Trade Balance: Continuing deficit, estimated at approximately -$500 million for the most recent reporting month.
Exports: Approx. $1.19 billion (Monthly).
Imports: Approx. $1.69 billion (Monthly).
Note: Uganda is successfully narrowing its deficit by pivoting gold and coffee exports to the UAE and India, reducing its reliance on the U.S. market.
4. SWOT Analysis: Uganda Economy 2026
Strengths | Weaknesses |
Natural Resources: Massive oil reserves (1.4B barrels) with production starting late 2026. | High Debt Service: Interest payments consume ~32% of government revenue. |
Demographics: 77% of the population is under 30, providing a massive future labor pool. | Infrastructure Gaps: High transport costs and "land-locked" logistics. |
Market Access: Strong member of the EAC (200M+ person market) and AfCFTA. | Corruption: Persistent bureaucratic inefficiencies and "middleman" costs. |
Opportunities | Threats |
Import Substitution: Using tariffs as an excuse to build local manufacturing (Parish Development Model). | Political Volatility: Uncertainty surrounding the January 2026 elections and succession. |
Regional Integration: Treating Kenya/Uganda trade as "transfers" rather than "imports" to bypass global tariffs. | Climate Vulnerability: 25% of GDP is agriculture-based; prone to unpredictable weather patterns. |
Value Addition: Moving from raw coffee beans to roasted/packaged exports for Asia/Europe. | U.S. Protectionism: Potential for further escalating tariffs (up to 25% predicted by June 2026). |
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |