top of page

Serbia

US Revised Tariffs (%)

10

Ease of doing business

theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:

Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.

 

Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.

david-whipple-mU-wz7JlJMc-unsplash_Ravid.jpg
Share of US Imports % (1 implies <1%)
US Tariff %
Revised Tariff %
Country Tariff Rate %
1
37
10
1.7
Exports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Imports (in USD Bill.) 2024
Balance (in USD Bill.) 2024
0.21
0.81
-0.6

US Revised Tariffs

Country Tariffs

Balance of Trade

Commercial Guide

Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals

Tariff Rate for US

World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.

US Imports Guide 

United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.

Implications

"As of Sunday, April 20, 2025, the most significant recent update regarding tariffs affecting Serbia involves the United States' imposition of new ""reciprocal tariffs."" Here's a breakdown of the situation: US Tariffs on Serbian Goods: The United States has imposed a 37% tariff on goods imported from Serbia.   This tariff went into effect on April 9, 2025, although there was an initial announcement on April 2nd. The U.S. government stated that these are ""reciprocal tariffs,"" meaning the rate was determined based on the tariffs Serbia allegedly imposes on American goods. The U.S. claims Serbia's tariffs on their goods reach as high as 74% when considering customs duties, VAT, and other costs. The 37% is reportedly half of this claimed rate. However, Serbian analysts and economists have disputed the 74% figure, stating that the actual customs duties on most industrial products from the U.S. are significantly lower, typically ranging between 5% and 10%, with some possibly reaching 20%. Serbia has officially requested an explanation from the U.S. regarding this calculation. Impact on Serbia: The 37% tariff is expected to negatively impact Serbian exports to the U.S., making them less competitive. Sectors likely to be most affected include the automotive industry (especially car tires) and the defense industry (mainly ammunition). Food products might also see some impact. While the U.S. is not Serbia's largest export market (ranking 19th and accounting for about 2% of total exports), the U.S. market has been growing in importance, with exports surpassing 600 million euros recently. Economists predict a potential decrease of €30-40 million in Serbian exports to the U.S. due to these tariffs. Indirect effects are also a concern, as Serbia is integrated into European production chains, meaning products using Serbian raw materials or components could also be affected by the broader U.S. tariffs on European goods. Serbia's Trade Agreements: It's important to note that Serbia has several free trade agreements that govern its trade relationships with other countries and blocs, which are separate from the recent U.S. tariffs:   European Union (EU): Serbia has a Stabilization and Association Agreement with the EU, which has largely abolished tariffs on most goods imported from the EU. There are some annual quotas for specific agricultural products.   Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA): Serbia is a member of CEFTA, which includes Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Moldova, Montenegro, and North Macedonia, facilitating duty-free trade among member countries.   Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU): Serbia has a free trade agreement with the EAEU and its member states (Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Russia), with some exceptions and quotas for specific goods.   Turkey: A free trade agreement with Turkey allows for duty-free exports from Serbia, with gradual elimination of duties on Turkish industrial products (some agricultural products still have tariffs).   European Free Trade Association (EFTA): Industrial products exported from Serbia to EFTA members (Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein) are mostly duty-free, with some exceptions for fish and marine products.   United Kingdom: Serbia has a bilateral free trade agreement with the UK.   China: A free trade agreement was signed with China in 2023 and is expected to come into force in mid-2024.   Generalized System of Preferences (GSP): Serbia is a beneficiary of GSP schemes from the U.S. and Japan, providing duty-free access for certain eligible products.   In summary, the latest tariff update for Serbia is the imposition of a 37% tariff by the United States on Serbian goods, based on a reciprocal approach linked to disputed claims about Serbia's tariffs on U.S. products. This development is expected to negatively impact Serbian exports to the U.S., particularly in the automotive and defense sectors. Serbia has a network of other free trade agreements that govern its trade with numerous other partners"

US Negotiation Strategy

Investing in USA

theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters

Sources : ForbesUSDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia International Trade Administration

theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.

theboardiQ Logo

Economic
Relevance
Ranking

Get Great Talent. Subscribe.

Thanks for subscribing!

265 Garnet Dr 

Livermore, CA 94550

  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
bottom of page