Ease of doing business
theboardiQ Tariffs Dashboard:
Powering Mutually Beneficial Global Trade.
Understand the complexities of international tariffs and ease of doing business across nations to cultivate balanced trade relationships, streamline operations, and deliver cost savings to end consumers.
Implications
As of January 20, 2026, the trade relationship between the United States and Curaçao is navigating a landscape of significantly increased U.S. protectionism. Curaçao, as a constituent country of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and a small, open economy, is particularly susceptible to these shifts due to its heavy reliance on U.S. imports and its role as a regional hub for tourism and petroleum services.
The following table summarizes the 2026 U.S. tariff updates and their multi-dimensional impact on Curaçao.
2026 US Tariffs Update: Curaçao Impact Profile
Category | Status / Impact Details |
Current Deals | Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI): Still the primary trade framework. While baseline tariffs have risen, CBI-eligible goods (like certain textiles or electronics) still receive preferential treatment, though they now face a 10% baseline floor as of April 2025. |
Trade Tariffs | Baseline Tariff: All goods from Curaçao entering the US are subject to a 10% baseline tariff (effective April 5, 2025). Reciprocal Tariffs: Since Curaçao is part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, it is potentially subject to EU-level reciprocal rates (up to 20%) if trade negotiations between the US and EU stall. |
Trade Impact | Import Inflation: As the US is Curaçao's top trading partner, the cost of raw materials and consumer goods from the US has risen by 10–15%. Transshipment Risk: Goods transshipped through Curaçao to avoid duties now face a 40% penalty tariff under new US enforcement rules. |
GDP Impact | Contraction Risk: Analysts have projected a lower real GDP growth for 2025-2026 compared to 2024. Inflation is expected to rise by 1.5% to 2.5% solely due to "imported inflation" from the US, dampening domestic consumption. |
Company Impact | Tourism (e.g., Sandals, Marriott): Rising costs of food/beverages imported from the US are squeezing margins for major resorts. Refining/Logistics (e.g., Bullenbaai, Global Oil): Threatened 25% "secondary tariffs" on countries importing Venezuelan or Russian oil create extreme compliance hurdles. |
Key Trends to Watch in 2026
The "Greenland Dispute" Escalation: Recent US threats (January 19, 2026) to increase tariffs to 25% on countries perceived as uncooperative in the Greenland acquisition talks may indirectly hit Curaçao due to its constitutional ties to the Netherlands.
De Minimis Thresholds: The elimination of the $800 duty-free exemption for low-value imports (implemented in late 2025) has significantly impacted Curaçao’s e-commerce and small-scale export businesses.
Energy Sector Vulnerability: The US administration's focus on "Secondary Tariffs" for oil means Curaçao's refinery and storage facilities must maintain strict "non-sanctioned" sourcing to avoid a 25% blanket tariff on all their US-bound exports.
US Revised Tariffs
Country Tariffs
Balance of Trade
Commercial Guide
Learn about the market conditions, opportunities, regulations, and business conditions in countries, prepared by U.S. Embassies worldwide, Commerce Department, State Department and other U.S. agencies’ professionals
Tariff Rate for US
World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on tariff data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System ( TRAINS ) database and global imports data from the United Nations Statistics Division's Comtrade database.
US Imports Guide
United States Imports from Countries during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Countries- data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025.
Investing in USA
theboardiQ Economic Relevance Score, ranks States of USA based on 11 parameters
Sources : Forbes | USDA Economic Research | TCGen Total Innovation Rank Index | Best States for Manufacturing | World Population Review | Tax Foundation | US News | BEA Data | Wikipedia | International Trade Administration
theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score provides a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of a nation's economic vitality and global significance. This score is meticulously calculated using 11 key parameters, each reflecting a critical facet of economic performance. It analyzes the representation of Fortune 500 companies within a nation, a strong indicator of its business environment and market size. The balance of trade surplus or deficit reveals the nation's international competitiveness and export strength. It incorporates Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a fundamental measure of overall economic output, and examine the health of key sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. The score also accounts for innovation, gauging a nation's ability to drive future growth through technological advancements. Crucial labor market indicators such as employment rates are considered, alongside fiscal policies reflected in tax rates. To capture the lived experience of citizens, it assesses cost of living and disposable income, providing insight into purchasing power and economic well-being. Finally, education levels are integrated, recognizing their pivotal role in fostering a skilled workforce and driving long-term economic development. By synthesizing these 11 parameters, theboardiQ's Economic Relevance Score delivers a nuanced and holistic view of a nation's economic standing, enabling informed strategic decisions. The Top 5 States in the assessment are Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Washington. Texas does consistently well across most of the 11 variables especially in the areas of GDP, F500 representation in the State, Balance of Trade where it ranks 2nd nationally. North Carolina scores as the highest-ranking state nationally in manufacturing and performs consistently across the other variables. Virginia does well in disposable income where it ranks 3rd nationally. It also scores high in the variables of manufacturing and employment Florida holds the 4th ranking nationally for GDP and Tax Washington State scores the top spot for disposable income nationally, 2nd for education and 3rd for innovation. Colorado, with an overall rank of 7 scores the top spot for Education (schools and higher education). Nebraska, that ranked 10th overall, did well in Agriculture where it is ranked 3rd nationally as well as Trade Balance where it ranked 5th. Illinois, though ranked 20th overall did well nationally in F500 representation, GDP, Agriculture, and Disposable Income. Pennsylvania comes in at 21 overall doing well nationally in GDP (6th); Manufacturing (8th) and F500 representation (8th) New York scores 23rd overall with a 2 ranking in Disposable Income nationally, as well as 3rd in both F500 representation and GDP. California comes in at 29th overall and has the top spot ranking in a whopping 4 variables nationally – GDP, Innovation, Agriculture and F500 representation. However, performance in the areas of Trade Balance, Cost of Living, Tax, Manufacturing and Employment resulted in the overall ranking dipping. Wyoming at 30th overall scores the top spot nationally in the area of Tax Massachusetts at 31 overall does well in innovation where it is ranked 2nd nationally Arkansas at 36 and Alabama at 39, do well in overall Cost of Living where they are ranked 2nd and 3rd nationally, respectively. Louisiana ranked 44th overall is ranked 1st in Trade Balance nationally.
Economic
Relevance
Ranking
State | Info | Overall Rank | Agri | Innov | Mfg | Employ | Tax | Edu | GDP | F500 Rep | Trade Balance | Cost of Living | Disp Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 13 | |
North Carolina | 2 | 9 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 41 | 17 | 17 | |
Virginia | 3 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 34 | 35 | 3 | |
Florida | 4 | 21 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 30 | 37 | |
Washington | 5 | 16 | 3 | 36 | 28 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 43 | 1 | |
Missouri | 6 | 11 | 25 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 32 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
Georgia | 7 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 26 | 34 | 8 | 9 | 43 | 26 | 19 | |
Minnesota | 8 | 6 | 10 | 47 | 6 | 44 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 33 | 33 | 9 | |
Ohio | 9 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 36 | 7 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 11 | |
Illinois | 10 | 5 | 23 | 31 | 23 | 37 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 47 | 32 | 7 |